Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mdio_bus: suppress err message for reset gpio
 EPROBE_DEFER
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20201119203446.20857-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
 <1a59fbe1-6a5d-81a3-4a86-fa3b5dbfdf8e@gmail.com>
 <cabad89e-23cc-18b3-8306-e5ef1ee4bfa6@ti.com>
 <44a3c8c0-9dbd-4059-bde8-98486dde269f@gmail.com>
 <20201119214139.GL1853236@lunn.ch>
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <221941d6-2bb1-9be8-7031-08071a509542@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Nov 2020 23:09:52 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201119214139.GL1853236@lunn.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Am 19.11.2020 um 22:41 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
>>>> Doesn't checkpatch complain about line length > 80 here?
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>> commit bdc48fa11e46f867ea4d75fa59ee87a7f48be144
>>> Author: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>> Date:   Fri May 29 16:12:21 2020 -0700
>>>
>>>     checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate 80-column warning
>>>
>>
>> Ah, again something learnt. Thanks for the reference.
> 
> But it then got revoked for netdev. Or at least it was planned to
> re-impose 80 for netdev. I don't know if checkpatch got patched yet.
> 
> 	  Andrew
> 
At a first glance it sounds strange that subsystems may define own
rules for such basic things. But supposedly there has been a longer
emotional disucssion about this already ..