Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1162324pxb; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:48:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwur8F/dUwrPTj0KtFxIGPjPG6FOngSOf9TMrIq6HTd++YFMXwg7Gwu83VZ8Ft+Xx0yKffw X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8496:: with SMTP id m22mr30293957ejx.298.1605869282278; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:48:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605869282; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IwWwCO8gNYIHIAYnpk2JmyQpGpoxzWlMNsPrSbAY5tpHUYk2fSqJeK729NhROPvONe DFVEvubxSJabKFoRTEqa4wMMXZRqvVKk0LHHOQ77caFMdaDnx/CfMlhAdhc7A8oGEME2 IgmGGu9JSSkUaMG9gD/34dFivYjefG9lCKucJAkRuQwCZnVyDz91pdNJ72qQbgKROxf0 ngMnm8Gnu5l6TVfZhk5Of6Xm2rHdE/ICZ6vVuCINR90aN0e9JPuSKxtSbMzPWpmnh71k OERsx7yxdfeScSPdIcyvasL/9k09xfrJSbq69+YFFci433qF0ptd6gpHdbaf8YpcElpc NpJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=w+alvQqPRpEXNo5K8hmtaWs8T2gO2NWZjynTiYpa5is=; b=HauZ+MLQDnEn8yZjKsPXG1o+6uVEXFcx+jl+98IlJquY7xNS2pTXht/ktEVTzFtyG4 LAm0bPN+xBch0jHL1W+16d6J2hyMGjP6FoWOutSbXMw9jFUIifoHIvJW73tO+vcEajQp Ga5GM83d5LqTMERJlCW0tLJfics/wwpuzJuYmOrCGyt7fkIYJbPv31lIcuesluq+qnwA hyhk5REYDjbPhkL31qHXPcwZyPkkWsc500oJEdg0Q9PMptY1tFDNCUO5yIhk4NAapKkl fWsz+Ul5SJJyfKoVdBkEduY7/j8tXSchv1w1DpSsKnJipJwnNHT15T3X+pF/j5q4ke2c zUkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27si1507571edw.379.2020.11.20.02.47.39; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:48:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727263AbgKTKqK (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:46:10 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com ([209.85.208.66]:33827 "EHLO mail-ed1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725956AbgKTKqJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:46:09 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id a15so9056574edy.1; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:46:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=w+alvQqPRpEXNo5K8hmtaWs8T2gO2NWZjynTiYpa5is=; b=IOghUvR4FyH7Vp+NRGDJbEQT9p0WjUdkym7NyH6avfnIgAn7nYtrIeUtv/YcfwzMDH JmzK4TrXs4sFg1yNQe4xW3enPNmJ50yTXepQa9d2eJ3LkVeuwyUScU9krFts49AiMMSQ sTGE9KNGsjOs0HoI6knj9b3+sd+ry7GPJNUqLEpl2lqypDF1ipnOMfMYcpeQF8S2EPBt K2lenaEYuY+TvAXbgJZcB4eVhbmbdK9RzWBwEqcHyEdsbiBAwygN8wWBhv0AYUhClnrv LMqNjr3BGm/bxfX6bc0mcrlAfJWm1BYaoAhA15yMjcwEHI+UTGVPR1UzAB8vlOM656Aq hyDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530X9bARND/HDXDFFav36DVnvzhKmuAIoy5l1lDJwW/qwchnKMHQ MmKJsTuGqcXmMwwU4lmrxCQ= X-Received: by 2002:a50:a40c:: with SMTP id u12mr21996264edb.337.1605869164578; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:46:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from kozik-lap (adsl-84-226-167-205.adslplus.ch. [84.226.167.205]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k2sm973070ejp.6.2020.11.20.02.46.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 02:46:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:46:02 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Alice Guo Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-imx@nxp.com, peng.fan@nxp.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] soc: imx8m: change to use platform driver Message-ID: <20201120104602.GA15052@kozik-lap> References: <20201120101112.31819-1-alice.guo@nxp.com> <20201120101112.31819-4-alice.guo@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201120101112.31819-4-alice.guo@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:11:12PM +0800, Alice Guo wrote: > Directly reading ocotp register depends on that bootloader enables ocotp > clk, which is not always effective, so change to use nvmem API. Using > nvmem API requires to support driver defer probe and thus change > soc-imx8m.c to use platform driver. > > The other reason is that directly reading ocotp register causes kexec > kernel hang because the 1st kernel running will disable unused clks > after kernel boots up, and then ocotp clk will be disabled even if > bootloader enables it. When kexec kernel, ocotp clk needs to be enabled > before reading ocotp registers, and nvmem API with platform driver > supported can accomplish this. > > v2: remove the subject prefix "LF-2571-4" > v3: Keep the original way which uses device_initcall to read soc unique > ID, and add the other way which uses module_platform_driver and > nvmem API, so that it will not break the old version DTBs. > v4: delete "__maybe_unused" > delete MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx8m_soc_match); > rename match table, "fsl,imx8mm/n/q/p" is actually a machine > compabile and "fsl,imx8mm/n/q/p-soc" is a compabile of soc@0 > delete "flag" and change to determine whether the pointer is NULL > ues of_find_matching_node_and_match() > delete of_match_ptr() Put all the patch version changelogs after --- separator, so they will not go to the commit. > > Signed-off-by: Alice Guo > --- > drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c > index cc57a384d74d..1b0a34e545ae 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8m.c > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -29,7 +31,7 @@ > > struct imx8_soc_data { > char *name; > - u32 (*soc_revision)(void); > + u32 (*soc_revision)(struct device *dev); > }; > > static u64 soc_uid; > @@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ static u32 imx8mq_soc_revision_from_atf(void) > static inline u32 imx8mq_soc_revision_from_atf(void) { return 0; }; > #endif > > -static u32 __init imx8mq_soc_revision(void) > +static u32 __init imx8mq_soc_revision(struct device *dev) > { > struct device_node *np; > void __iomem *ocotp_base; > @@ -75,9 +77,19 @@ static u32 __init imx8mq_soc_revision(void) > rev = REV_B1; > } > > - soc_uid = readl_relaxed(ocotp_base + OCOTP_UID_HIGH); > - soc_uid <<= 32; > - soc_uid |= readl_relaxed(ocotp_base + OCOTP_UID_LOW); > + if (dev) { > + int ret = 0; > + > + ret = nvmem_cell_read_u64(dev, "soc_unique_id", &soc_uid); > + if (ret) { > + iounmap(ocotp_base); What about other cleanup parts? of_node_put? > + return ret; > + } > + } else { > + soc_uid = readl_relaxed(ocotp_base + OCOTP_UID_HIGH); > + soc_uid <<= 32; > + soc_uid |= readl_relaxed(ocotp_base + OCOTP_UID_LOW); > + } > > iounmap(ocotp_base); > of_node_put(np); > @@ -107,7 +119,7 @@ static void __init imx8mm_soc_uid(void) > of_node_put(np); > } > > -static u32 __init imx8mm_soc_revision(void) > +static u32 __init imx8mm_soc_revision(struct device *dev) > { > struct device_node *np; > void __iomem *anatop_base; > @@ -125,7 +137,15 @@ static u32 __init imx8mm_soc_revision(void) > iounmap(anatop_base); > of_node_put(np); > > - imx8mm_soc_uid(); > + if (dev) { > + int ret = 0; > + > + ret = nvmem_cell_read_u64(dev, "soc_unique_id", &soc_uid); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } else { > + imx8mm_soc_uid(); > + } > > return rev; > } > @@ -150,7 +170,7 @@ static const struct imx8_soc_data imx8mp_soc_data = { > .soc_revision = imx8mm_soc_revision, > }; > > -static __maybe_unused const struct of_device_id imx8_soc_match[] = { > +static const struct of_device_id imx8_machine_match[] = { > { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mq", .data = &imx8mq_soc_data, }, > { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm", .data = &imx8mm_soc_data, }, > { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mn", .data = &imx8mn_soc_data, }, > @@ -158,12 +178,20 @@ static __maybe_unused const struct of_device_id imx8_soc_match[] = { > { } > }; > > +static const struct of_device_id imx8_soc_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-soc", .data = &imx8mq_soc_data, }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-soc", .data = &imx8mm_soc_data, }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-soc", .data = &imx8mn_soc_data, }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-soc", .data = &imx8mp_soc_data, }, > + { } > +}; > + > #define imx8_revision(soc_rev) \ > soc_rev ? \ > kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%d.%d", (soc_rev >> 4) & 0xf, soc_rev & 0xf) : \ > "unknown" > > -static int __init imx8_soc_init(void) > +static int imx8_soc_info(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr; > struct soc_device *soc_dev; > @@ -182,7 +210,10 @@ static int __init imx8_soc_init(void) > if (ret) > goto free_soc; > > - id = of_match_node(imx8_soc_match, of_root); > + if (pdev) > + id = of_match_node(imx8_soc_match, pdev->dev.of_node); > + else > + id = of_match_node(imx8_machine_match, of_root); > if (!id) { > ret = -ENODEV; > goto free_soc; > @@ -191,8 +222,16 @@ static int __init imx8_soc_init(void) > data = id->data; > if (data) { > soc_dev_attr->soc_id = data->name; > - if (data->soc_revision) > - soc_rev = data->soc_revision(); > + if (data->soc_revision) { > + if (pdev) { > + soc_rev = data->soc_revision(&pdev->dev); > + ret = soc_rev; > + if (ret < 0) > + goto free_soc; > + } else { > + soc_rev = data->soc_revision(NULL); > + } > + } > } > > soc_dev_attr->revision = imx8_revision(soc_rev); > @@ -230,4 +269,26 @@ static int __init imx8_soc_init(void) > kfree(soc_dev_attr); > return ret; > } > + > +static int __init imx8_soc_init(void) > +{ > + int ret = 0; Skip the initialization. You need to document why the initcal is still there. Please write that it is purely for backward compatibility. Best regards, Krzysztof