Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:36:54 +0100
From:   Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
To:     Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pwm: pca9685: Add staggered-outputs property
Message-ID: <X7e4Zj1yejjLBFyl@workstation.tuxnet>
References: <20201118174515.278067-1-clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
 <20201120082150.kyihkhphph7wosfz@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20201120082150.kyihkhphph7wosfz@pengutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:21:50AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > The pca9685 driver supports a new staggered-outputs property for reduced
> > current surges and EMI. This adds documentation for the new DT property.
> 
> Maybe point out the commit that added this support here?

The pca9685 driver patch was not yet accepted and there will be a v2.

Should I wait until the support is in Linus' tree and only then send a
dt-bindings documentation patch, mentioning the commit?

Best regards,
Clemens