Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1373673pxb; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:02:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztJC1DrYpS2zWvJmnafXLi/VQhrhdQNF89ot7YLneyRO/eZSCJeMJEb57+/z8YhcR2UssN X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5853:: with SMTP id x19mr7527940ljd.232.1605888122181; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:02:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605888122; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P1JIFkNQPkgtQJbUk3Q4wMLJx1L26pEUbEI0ZuZqQVc3mBNVyGAMwX8+KfIHkH1YdL 1iODhMSrd7bbhljbC5IbxzLm9ewF30CGJ68uv45ex4VdjlPbZsMXWSetLhBqr6f87n86 IaHtuiVluBg3Keka3b4AKNgjZpw3v/2QJ7VP3U+WIS0Hq/zghYfLYTv9oBJiB5BoaqmQ 5407U919AqzbbNS1IVwlJQT0J8h4u2ao2TWMjZalxKlkOF3ZBt2VPgw9EEsJYd5aqRvG oBxl44AW2G+/GbrbrLGjG3dQHF3TlJ+dG+P6lZwkAl7YqrOoRZERuC1jcrso1Uq8Dv8p jQKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:cms-type:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=mJ7tA81AK0Z77Z+3ZEjUVCU+x515iFoUHn4Cwgl/Rjw=; b=nqiAVrHdQ6wUlNspiTcG5BW1tpkbEGsG9s+Aaw6yClVd3H8VgZ+/ablhYYPznBf47j IO6EPH7KfHtDHKxVhru7LIksphX9Ydh5OQRDq85QXO3z2oumlipX5kA4BhEy2XqE8cdf za8yjOG8/zNzgAszfXO3tokzZWv7qTlzbqVIZTp8ApVtULXQD44HEMQHyvkCM7uO7c6S YtpKx6lQrqXxT2ecLoNYRuqa3Rux/lo5968tbqJPgHf7xalIUIJFMmV7I0ULbjPYfLV2 vILBOxPp6BiQaumoZa++1hG9UnH33PxJfcmO43iRBprXeUTyAoebkstr7VhWNDdf8Mr4 DhPQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@samsung.com header.s=mail20170921 header.b=svlE4VrJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=samsung.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w6si1905566ejc.271.2020.11.20.08.01.30; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@samsung.com header.s=mail20170921 header.b=svlE4VrJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=samsung.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729980AbgKTP6C (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:58:02 -0500 Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:52809 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729945AbgKTP6B (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 10:58:01 -0500 Received: from eucas1p1.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.206]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20201120155749euoutp01b5609b6114c69661b22a0f0287b60054~JQoIwUhyB0224902249euoutp01L for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:57:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout1.w1.samsung.com 20201120155749euoutp01b5609b6114c69661b22a0f0287b60054~JQoIwUhyB0224902249euoutp01L DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1605887869; bh=mJ7tA81AK0Z77Z+3ZEjUVCU+x515iFoUHn4Cwgl/Rjw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:References:From; b=svlE4VrJEu+JcIQLSTSz9cpMtd2GuH5ZKly6uDAQXle2/QCh9EKS5+CBLz5tpnzd6 7/zCKLv+oxSv09Ak4Zkz/14cdeZHCKIPjRqGZ2+M/tMYdxyGW9i2vK8HWRyCjoHiJp Q17xDsqzhgQrey9H8fW515mc297TZPTHxUY2l4Cc= Received: from eusmges2new.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244]) by eucas1p1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20201120155748eucas1p14243ff862ab203297b063ef0113f72e7~JQoIGdJcF3174931749eucas1p14; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:57:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eucas1p1.samsung.com ( [182.198.249.206]) by eusmges2new.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id AB.C1.44805.C77E7BF5; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:57:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eusmtrp1.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.138]) by eucas1p2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id 20201120155747eucas1p248a1f0b71fbd8f329271494d7a207347~JQoHliDF81488714887eucas1p2b; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:57:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eusmgms1.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.179]) by eusmtrp1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20201120155747eusmtrp155b4e4c18e4274cdeae1c9f6d2935ccb~JQoHk3GPb1261812618eusmtrp18; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:57:47 +0000 (GMT) X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-b4fff7000000af05-21-5fb7e77c2df6 Received: from eusmtip1.samsung.com ( [203.254.199.221]) by eusmgms1.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id AC.00.21957.B77E7BF5; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:57:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from AMDC3061.digital.local (unknown [106.120.51.75]) by eusmtip1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id 20201120155747eusmtip112487d9e984fdd76236f9905e676d198~JQoG8iVQa0505805058eusmtip1q; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:57:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Sylwester Nawrocki To: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, tomasz.figa@gmail.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, krzk@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com Cc: sboyd@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com Subject: [PATCH v5] clk: samsung: Prevent potential endless loop in the PLL ops Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:57:31 +0100 Message-Id: <20201120155731.26898-1-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWy7djPc7o1z7fHG+z/yWuxccZ6VovrX56z Wpw/v4Hd4mPPPVaLy7vmsFnMOL+PyWLtkbvsFhdPuVocftPOavHv2kYWi1W7/jA6cHu8v9HK 7rFz1l12j02rOtk8+rasYvT4vEkugDWKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK2PeodPsBcf8K94evc/WwHjJ oYuRk0NCwETiZecx9i5GLg4hgRWMEoeXHWWCcL4wShy73swC4XxmlNjy6SETTMuKZZuZQWwh geWMEnt/acN17J7yigUkwSZgKNF7tI8RxBYRqJA4fekC2A5mgSWMEtuXbQRLCAsESjTuusMO YrMIqEosmPUWbCqvgLVEx9ZPLBDb5CVWbzjADNIsIbCQQ+Lk3VWsEAkXiR3PTkKdJCzx6vgW dghbRuL05B4WiIZmRome3bfZIZwJjBL3jy9ghKiylrhz7hdbFyMH0E2aEut36UOEHSUOPXjB BBKWEOCTuPFWECTMDGRO2jadGSLMK9HRJgRRrSLxe9V0qBOkJLqf/Ie62UNi4fGpLJAQipXY MPUA8wRGuVkIuxYwMq5iFE8tLc5NTy02ykst1ytOzC0uzUvXS87P3cQITBqn/x3/soNx+auP eocYmTgYDzFKcDArifCu1dwaL8SbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIhRmoNFSZw3acuaeCGB9MSS1OzU 1ILUIpgsEwenVANTSNlUWV3l+3OLfwZyz52TVDNjAptntc380FOtBtyzln+Y4f9Qd/KmUzc1 mtvP/+Hdtt6D9dGWKzbRN0Jert5bufSt4saiPXo81/KCtu5q7J1w27SEVTMgKX5H6w7m5Xry S+8/UzCZ7nTpVYWcl95yicPl1c/fHUpzmunMa8U7cTqbn/j8MN+fzw5KqKsf1M6J2pGzNz9N nc/o+XqtNOVgFc+VSyeG7rmvFWT0u/5czf9lkp/+88Vtf/7/zeYNBX01V/+ERfuWPXudsKQ6 UGv1M6N/QpcWcRluW1ui9qGLXVV217a2BULT78lWTZxdkvD05KJZTJWzyqWvbIiykIy6ZFZy 9XfZDS3ON7/6dyxbrcRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAKN7+w+JAwAA X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xu7rVz7fHG9y9rmaxccZ6VovrX56z Wpw/v4Hd4mPPPVaLy7vmsFnMOL+PyWLtkbvsFhdPuVocftPOavHv2kYWi1W7/jA6cHu8v9HK 7rFz1l12j02rOtk8+rasYvT4vEkugDVKz6Yov7QkVSEjv7jEVina0MJIz9DSQs/IxFLP0Ng8 1srIVEnfziYlNSezLLVI3y5BL2PeodPsBcf8K94evc/WwHjJoYuRk0NCwERixbLNzF2MXBxC AksZJQ7dWMnSxcgBlJCSmN+iBFEjLPHnWhcbRM0nRomGp38ZQRJsAoYSvUf7wGwRgTqJE8un sIPYzAKrGCXO3PUBsYUF/CXuvDrBAmKzCKhKLJj1lhnE5hWwlujY+okFYoG8xOoNB5gnMPIs YGRYxSiSWlqcm55bbKhXnJhbXJqXrpecn7uJERio24793LyDcd6rj3qHGJk4GA8xSnAwK4nw rtXcGi/Em5JYWZValB9fVJqTWnyI0RRo30RmKdHkfGCs5JXEG5oZmBqamFkamFqaGSuJ826d uyZeSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIpo+Jg1OqgamU48m6n2k6uipNeY/ykzi3Lt1leX7bK+cpWzt9Z1S9 dSn38lTO6f53vdb2+cLZtz7/+pl0Z13BiWlumz+L/buXxeby/+9PX4Vfp1erJq3dcyLmMMtu 16BJCxhv8b9+7ygW62y36pr/CV7hCdZ+n2PFrYsjttscn/hykdKb0FOJHBf1eOqTl+jviHwU 96i7Uf2jPKfo/byt/qKNx+bJJ3gvbl07p/xyT5iD5dS3j4uKxVr5rlv3nvH0vvlI2fKSXPnB +vL85xaHvh46kCcbp3q923qqd3NQxO3Lj2+fjpP3Ofu862uf6nvzyLMprjzy53OOarDdbmE8 V/KvNrmZX7Px5O26qQu+S9a+qUvJ91BiKc5INNRiLipOBACB2wBM3QIAAA== X-CMS-MailID: 20201120155747eucas1p248a1f0b71fbd8f329271494d7a207347 X-Msg-Generator: CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RootMTR: 20201120155747eucas1p248a1f0b71fbd8f329271494d7a207347 X-EPHeader: CA CMS-TYPE: 201P X-CMS-RootMailID: 20201120155747eucas1p248a1f0b71fbd8f329271494d7a207347 References: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The PLL status polling loops in the set_rate callbacks of some PLLs have no timeout detection and may become endless loops when something goes wrong with the PLL. For some PLLs there is already the ktime API based timeout detection, but it will not work in all conditions when .set_rate gets called. In particular, before the clocksource is initialized or when the timekeeping is suspended. This patch adds a common helper with the PLL status bit polling and timeout detection. For conditions where the timekeeping API should not be used a simple readl_relaxed/cpu_relax() busy loop is added with the iterations limit derived from measurements of readl_relaxed() execution time for various PLL types and Exynos SoCs variants. Actual PLL lock time depends on the P divider value, the VCO frequency and a constant PLL type specific LOCK_FACTOR and can be calculated as lock_time = Pdiv * LOCK_FACTOR / VCO_freq For the ktime API use cases a common timeout value of 20 ms is applied for all the PLLs with an assumption that maximum possible value of Pdiv is 64, maximum possible LOCK_FACTOR value is 3000 and minimum VCO frequency is 24 MHz. Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki --- I'm not sure whether we actually need to implement precise timeouts, likely the simple busy loop case would be enough. AFAIK the PLL failures happen very rarely, mostly in early code development stage for given platform. Changes since v4: - s/__early_timeout/pll_early_timeout Changes since v3: - dropped udelay() from the PLL status bit polling loop as it didn't work on arm64 at early boot time, before timekeeping was initialized, - use the timekeeping API in cases when it is already initialized and not suspended, - use samsung_pll_lock_wait() also in samsung_pll3xxx_enable() function, now all potential endless loops are eliminated. --- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c index ac70ad7..5873a93 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c @@ -8,14 +8,17 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include +#include #include #include #include "clk.h" #include "clk-pll.h" -#define PLL_TIMEOUT_MS 10 +#define PLL_TIMEOUT_US 20000U +#define PLL_TIMEOUT_LOOPS 1000000U struct samsung_clk_pll { struct clk_hw hw; @@ -63,6 +66,53 @@ static long samsung_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, return rate_table[i - 1].rate; } +static bool pll_early_timeout = true; + +static int __init samsung_pll_disable_early_timeout(void) +{ + pll_early_timeout = false; + return 0; +} +arch_initcall(samsung_pll_disable_early_timeout); + +/* Wait until the PLL is locked */ +static int samsung_pll_lock_wait(struct samsung_clk_pll *pll, + unsigned int reg_mask) +{ + int i, ret; + u32 val; + + /* + * This function might be called when the timekeeping API can't be used + * to detect timeouts. One situation is when the clocksource is not yet + * initialized, another when the timekeeping is suspended. udelay() also + * cannot be used when the clocksource is not running on arm64, since + * the current timer is used as cycle counter. So a simple busy loop + * is used here in that special cases. The limit of iterations has been + * derived from experimental measurements of various PLLs on multiple + * Exynos SoC variants. Single register read time was usually in range + * 0.4...1.5 us, never less than 0.4 us. + */ + if (pll_early_timeout || timekeeping_suspended) { + i = PLL_TIMEOUT_LOOPS; + while (i-- > 0) { + if (readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg) & reg_mask) + return 0; + + cpu_relax(); + } + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + } else { + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(pll->con_reg, val, + val & reg_mask, 0, PLL_TIMEOUT_US); + } + + if (ret < 0) + pr_err("Could not lock PLL %s\n", clk_hw_get_name(&pll->hw)); + + return ret; +} + static int samsung_pll3xxx_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) { struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); @@ -72,13 +122,7 @@ static int samsung_pll3xxx_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) tmp |= BIT(pll->enable_offs); writel_relaxed(tmp, pll->con_reg); - /* wait lock time */ - do { - cpu_relax(); - tmp = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); - } while (!(tmp & BIT(pll->lock_offs))); - - return 0; + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, BIT(pll->lock_offs)); } static void samsung_pll3xxx_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) @@ -240,13 +284,10 @@ static int samsung_pll35xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, (rate->sdiv << PLL35XX_SDIV_SHIFT); writel_relaxed(tmp, pll->con_reg); - /* Wait until the PLL is locked if it is enabled. */ - if (tmp & BIT(pll->enable_offs)) { - do { - cpu_relax(); - tmp = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); - } while (!(tmp & BIT(pll->lock_offs))); - } + /* Wait for PLL lock if the PLL is enabled */ + if (tmp & BIT(pll->enable_offs)) + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, BIT(pll->lock_offs)); + return 0; } @@ -318,7 +359,7 @@ static int samsung_pll36xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, unsigned long parent_rate) { struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); - u32 tmp, pll_con0, pll_con1; + u32 pll_con0, pll_con1; const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate; rate = samsung_get_pll_settings(pll, drate); @@ -356,13 +397,8 @@ static int samsung_pll36xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, pll_con1 |= rate->kdiv << PLL36XX_KDIV_SHIFT; writel_relaxed(pll_con1, pll->con_reg + 4); - /* wait_lock_time */ - if (pll_con0 & BIT(pll->enable_offs)) { - do { - cpu_relax(); - tmp = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); - } while (!(tmp & BIT(pll->lock_offs))); - } + if (pll_con0 & BIT(pll->enable_offs)) + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, BIT(pll->lock_offs)); return 0; } @@ -437,7 +473,6 @@ static int samsung_pll45xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate; u32 con0, con1; - ktime_t start; /* Get required rate settings from table */ rate = samsung_get_pll_settings(pll, drate); @@ -488,21 +523,8 @@ static int samsung_pll45xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, writel_relaxed(con1, pll->con_reg + 0x4); writel_relaxed(con0, pll->con_reg); - /* Wait for locking. */ - start = ktime_get(); - while (!(readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg) & PLL45XX_LOCKED)) { - ktime_t delta = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start); - - if (ktime_to_ms(delta) > PLL_TIMEOUT_MS) { - pr_err("%s: could not lock PLL %s\n", - __func__, clk_hw_get_name(hw)); - return -EFAULT; - } - - cpu_relax(); - } - - return 0; + /* Wait for PLL lock */ + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, PLL45XX_LOCKED); } static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll45xx_clk_ops = { @@ -588,7 +610,6 @@ static int samsung_pll46xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate; u32 con0, con1, lock; - ktime_t start; /* Get required rate settings from table */ rate = samsung_get_pll_settings(pll, drate); @@ -647,21 +668,8 @@ static int samsung_pll46xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, writel_relaxed(con0, pll->con_reg); writel_relaxed(con1, pll->con_reg + 0x4); - /* Wait for locking. */ - start = ktime_get(); - while (!(readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg) & PLL46XX_LOCKED)) { - ktime_t delta = ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start); - - if (ktime_to_ms(delta) > PLL_TIMEOUT_MS) { - pr_err("%s: could not lock PLL %s\n", - __func__, clk_hw_get_name(hw)); - return -EFAULT; - } - - cpu_relax(); - } - - return 0; + /* Wait for PLL lock */ + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, PLL46XX_LOCKED); } static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll46xx_clk_ops = { @@ -1035,14 +1043,9 @@ static int samsung_pll2550xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, (rate->sdiv << PLL2550XX_S_SHIFT); writel_relaxed(tmp, pll->con_reg); - /* wait_lock_time */ - do { - cpu_relax(); - tmp = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); - } while (!(tmp & (PLL2550XX_LOCK_STAT_MASK - << PLL2550XX_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT))); - - return 0; + /* Wait for PLL lock */ + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, + PLL2550XX_LOCK_STAT_MASK << PLL2550XX_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT); } static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll2550xx_clk_ops = { @@ -1132,13 +1135,9 @@ static int samsung_pll2650x_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, con1 |= ((rate->kdiv & PLL2650X_K_MASK) << PLL2650X_K_SHIFT); writel_relaxed(con1, pll->con_reg + 4); - do { - cpu_relax(); - con0 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); - } while (!(con0 & (PLL2650X_LOCK_STAT_MASK - << PLL2650X_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT))); - - return 0; + /* Wait for PLL lock */ + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, + PLL2650X_LOCK_STAT_MASK << PLL2650X_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT); } static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll2650x_clk_ops = { @@ -1196,7 +1195,7 @@ static int samsung_pll2650xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, unsigned long parent_rate) { struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); - u32 tmp, pll_con0, pll_con2; + u32 pll_con0, pll_con2; const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate; rate = samsung_get_pll_settings(pll, drate); @@ -1229,11 +1228,7 @@ static int samsung_pll2650xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate, writel_relaxed(pll_con0, pll->con_reg); writel_relaxed(pll_con2, pll->con_reg + 8); - do { - tmp = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); - } while (!(tmp & (0x1 << PLL2650XX_PLL_LOCKTIME_SHIFT))); - - return 0; + return samsung_pll_lock_wait(pll, 0x1 << PLL2650XX_PLL_LOCKTIME_SHIFT); } static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll2650xx_clk_ops = { -- 2.7.4