Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:07:10 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To:     fuyao@allwinnertech.com
Cc:     wens@csie.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] introduce sunxi hwspinlock
Message-ID: <20201120160710.wlkl5cdfqlrym2fj@gilmour>
References: <y>
 <cover.1605767679.git.fuyao@allwinnertech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wvdbsbhph2y6vxbz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1605767679.git.fuyao@allwinnertech.com>
Precedence: bulk


--wvdbsbhph2y6vxbz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 02:44:51PM +0800, fuyao@allwinnertech.com wrote:
> From: fuyao <fuyao@allwinnertech.com>
>=20
> this series add hwspinlock of sunxi. it provides hardware assistance for
> synchronization between the multiple processors in the system.
> (Or1k, Cortex-A7, Cortex-A53, Xtensa)

Xtensa? Which SoC has an Xtensa core?

Unfortunately, there's been a submission of the same driver earlier this we=
ek:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1605693132.git.wilken.gottwalt@posteo.ne=
t/

It would be great if you could point out whatever issue there is with
that patch series (it looks like the retry delay could be useful for
example).

Thanks!
Maxime

--wvdbsbhph2y6vxbz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCX7fprgAKCRDj7w1vZxhR
xffJAQCaE5uHPjtJHu2/qTK2U4iyIBEO9mGgMR1pi2r8kwQ8BAD/RwifMTitHOEd
lrcNueEDkhuO9gIH9a3haGBBuQsWWA8=
=VDdt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wvdbsbhph2y6vxbz--