Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030409AbWHXXm5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:42:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030410AbWHXXm5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:42:57 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:61397 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030409AbWHXXm4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:42:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17646.14556.535277.434642@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:40:12 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] dubious process system time. In-Reply-To: <20060824121825.GA4425@skybase> References: <20060824121825.GA4425@skybase> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 523 Lines: 15 Martin Schwidefsky writes: > The system time that is accounted to a process includes the time spent > in three different contexts: normal system time, hardirq time and > softirq time. Is that true (at the moment) with CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y? I thought it wasn't. Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/