Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965080AbWHYFlQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:41:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965085AbWHYFlQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:41:16 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:43679 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965080AbWHYFlP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:41:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:43:50 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: another NUMA build error Message-Id: <20060825144350.27530dfb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20060824213559.1be3d60f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20060824213559.1be3d60f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Organization: Fujitsu X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 938 Lines: 29 On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:35:59 -0700 "Randy.Dunlap" wrote: > Hi, > I was just trying to reproduce that 'register_one_node' > build error (and couldn't even with the supplied .config file; > weird). Anyway, after I enabled CONFIG_NUMA (but not CONFIG_ACPI), > I got the following error message. Seems that some config > options should prevent this config from even being possible > to create. Any ideas or suggestions? > Hi, there are 2 ways. 1. allow only 2 configs for i386/NUMA - CONFIG_NUMA + CONFIG_ACPI + CONFIG_ACPI_SRAT - CONFIG_NUMA + CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ 2. allow this and fix include/asm-i386/mmzone.h - CONFIG_NUMA + !CONFIG_ACP Which is sane ? -KameI - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/