Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751233AbWHYHiM (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:38:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751235AbWHYHiM (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:38:12 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48801 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751233AbWHYHiK (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:38:10 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: Unnecessary Relocation Hiding? Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:38:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: "Dong Feng" , "Christoph Lameter" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200608250818.49139.ak@suse.de> <17646.42148.880959.99796@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <17646.42148.880959.99796@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608250938.06240.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 513 Lines: 15 On Friday 25 August 2006 09:20, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Andi Kleen writes: > > > Best is to avoid undefined behaviour in new code. > > Of course. But do you have a way to implement per_cpu() without it? I was describing the ideal, not the practical reality. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/