Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <368300090d93ad66f7fb19076d076d4321a04c42.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] checkpatch: add fix option for LOGICAL_CONTINUATIONS
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
Cc:     lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Sun, 22 Nov 2020 03:32:53 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20201122111025.17978-1-yashsri421@gmail.com>
References: <1823e72eb92280d30457dda49e0a0036dee15dd3.camel@perches.com>
         <20201122111025.17978-1-yashsri421@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 16:40 +0530, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
> Currently, checkpatch warns if logical continuations are placed at the
> start of a line and not at the end of previous line.
> 
> E.g., running checkpatch on commit 3485507fc272 ("staging:
> bcm2835-camera: Reduce length of enum names") reports:
> 
> CHECK:LOGICAL_CONTINUATIONS: Logical continuations should be on the
> previous line
> +	if (!ret
> +	    && camera_port ==
> 
> Provide a simple fix by adding logical operator at the end of previous
> line and removing from current line, if both the lines are additions
> (ie start with '+')

Not quite yet.

> changes in v5: improve regex for comment and line end with '$;'
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -3553,8 +3553,17 @@ sub process {
> ?
> 
> ?# check for && or || at the start of a line
> ?		if ($rawline =~ /^\+\s*(&&|\|\|)/) {
> -			CHK("LOGICAL_CONTINUATIONS",
> -			    "Logical continuations should be on the previous line\n" . $hereprev);
> +			my $operator = $1;
> +			if (CHK("LOGICAL_CONTINUATIONS",
> +				"Logical continuations should be on the previous line\n" . $hereprev) &&
> +			    $fix && $prevrawline =~ /^\+/) {
> +				# add logical operator to the previous line, remove from current line
> +				if ($prevline =~ /[\s$;]*$/) {

This if is misleading as it will always match at least the EOL

> +					my $line_end = substr($prevrawline, $-[0]);
> +					$fixed[$fixlinenr - 1] =~ s/\Q$line_end\E/ $operator$line_end/;

It makes it seem as if this part is only done when the test is true.
The test is always true.