Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp239067pxu; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 06:26:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLlL1Y7xn0RuP/DsFgeD1mfYOn90Qg2se2lI4vqXxTOXU/BtoyoJQq6was4tWp+p+1XonD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:cb4:: with SMTP id cn20mr42748230edb.235.1606055196167; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 06:26:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606055196; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NknFPX/kP/bluxSQUkh7HdsnaVygtpYoBVcMKlrq8Sx/xwiX11+1jVq2iq3DPN7X/b Tqp/8BCO9pzzLIfPjnOMGovM36Lmav+xv8d2XmJJdaXWQRD/MQ+2egTtalVx9mHFCDHe TdZfpGkkyxjulJx6RPsL/YWP5/Za1zEj1RBgfjFckYrk+gcfYOQ5FOFmMeCD3P3KDN1g F+cZ8rFxzkWRflWKT3wVxMI2SmCXrzPghUEPZXlkwV+aSZrLzkD5806P7DKMQifvn7je X2In0NutshTGv96S/ooAqNY9qBDZiFwakC0FSWA5nUM0yRURqt6jBx2w3ANQbxKW55lE ZrcA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter:sender:dkim-signature; bh=Qbk4lITnLr1zMdM2FZ1pm/SnJvA/VeqVHp7zTxf2TRw=; b=yXN8x/xAYZ5gSqS1rhti1pMxHJ31GeuNH8kkV/edP7jaqCv0sTpXDrDqH/56dRRF5J hrpfCkPlolgauZ7wBQRejf7VEjfhvbOzIJwWi+tIYhmJe0Ji3VGidoGGclGXKSNo+vaw i+EPkVmD7/+kQlukd/cmr3PMF9Tkvblu1DXFGD3EgGP8Gt8amH3DHGAwcyNFKAKCWfqS os4xqCVsYn2oWq7vbBtvogr7CsBow1Bu7DIAP79yvYtUBdk14dM2k5v3GtAtRjA4pTET lwjxe9GqDE3K8nS1MvCwLWWHgBp9LhvD08SPySTbxxKtJ9FuwUtNEDsLJl4oXir/RRaM YfpQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=vJyZEOdS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d5si1545222edx.370.2020.11.22.06.26.12; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 06:26:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=vJyZEOdS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726436AbgKVOXm (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:23:42 -0500 Received: from z5.mailgun.us ([104.130.96.5]:52123 "EHLO z5.mailgun.us" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727634AbgKVOXl (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:23:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1606055019; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=Qbk4lITnLr1zMdM2FZ1pm/SnJvA/VeqVHp7zTxf2TRw=; b=vJyZEOdSF5TMv+hSH91ddYZVUjHm8g/73DR4EKTbnkGDoiOJF4AjOkaE7kq2/I6pgF61K3dc nw6Qa1tEgQVBQHSUcr8PrV5MkefPDASQOv0MUErFhJGMiaGHdPmeZSFyUKmvsiKRo1BXF+Cx 4R9n216Uvj2W9PGb/Qn8nW5/evI= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.96.5 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n05.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5fba745de9b70886222061fe (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:23:25 GMT Sender: neeraju=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 649E6C43467; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:23:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [192.168.0.101] (unknown [124.123.182.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: neeraju) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2652C433C6; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:23:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org A2652C433C6 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=neeraju@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/5] srcu: Provide polling interfaces for Tree SRCU grace periods To: paulmck@kernel.org Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org References: <20201117004017.GA7444@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201117004052.14758-5-paulmck@kernel.org> <20201121001602.GO1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> From: Neeraj Upadhyay Message-ID: <60163765-35ad-fa8b-a7a9-1f7596c3e9b5@codeaurora.org> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 19:52:58 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201121001602.GO1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/21/2020 5:46 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 05:31:43PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote: >> >> >> On 11/17/2020 6:10 AM, paulmck@kernel.org wrote: >>> From: "Paul E. McKenney" >>> >>> There is a need for a polling interface for SRCU grace >>> periods, so this commit supplies get_state_synchronize_srcu(), >>> start_poll_synchronize_srcu(), and poll_state_synchronize_srcu() for this >>> purpose. The first can be used if future grace periods are inevitable >>> (perhaps due to a later call_srcu() invocation), the second if future >>> grace periods might not otherwise happen, and the third to check if a >>> grace period has elapsed since the corresponding call to either of the >>> first two. >>> >>> As with get_state_synchronize_rcu() and cond_synchronize_rcu(), >>> the return value from either get_state_synchronize_srcu() or >>> start_poll_synchronize_srcu() must be passed in to a later call to >>> poll_state_synchronize_srcu(). >>> >>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/ >>> Reported-by: Kent Overstreet >>> [ paulmck: Add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() per kernel test robot feedback. ] >>> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney >>> --- >>> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c >>> index d930ece..015d80e 100644 >>> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c >>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c >>> @@ -810,7 +810,8 @@ static void srcu_leak_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp) >>> /* >>> * Start an SRCU grace period, and also queue the callback if non-NULL. >>> */ >>> -static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp, bool do_norm) >>> +static unsigned long srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, >>> + struct rcu_head *rhp, bool do_norm) >>> { >>> unsigned long flags; >>> int idx; >>> @@ -822,7 +823,8 @@ static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rh >>> idx = srcu_read_lock(ssp); >>> sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda); >>> spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(sdp, flags); >>> - rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&sdp->srcu_cblist, rhp); >>> + if (rhp) >>> + rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&sdp->srcu_cblist, rhp); >>> rcu_segcblist_advance(&sdp->srcu_cblist, >>> rcu_seq_current(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq)); >>> s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq); >>> @@ -841,6 +843,7 @@ static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rh >>> else if (needexp) >>> srcu_funnel_exp_start(ssp, sdp->mynode, s); >>> srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx); >>> + return s; >>> } >>> /* >>> @@ -882,7 +885,7 @@ static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp, >>> return; >>> } >>> rhp->func = func; >>> - srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, rhp, do_norm); >>> + (void)srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, rhp, do_norm); >>> } >>> /** >>> @@ -1011,6 +1014,60 @@ void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp) >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu); >>> +/** >>> + * get_state_synchronize_srcu - Provide an end-of-grace-period cookie >>> + * @ssp: srcu_struct to provide cookie for. >>> + * >>> + * This function returns a cookie that can be passed to >>> + * poll_state_synchronize_srcu(), which will return true if a full grace >>> + * period has elapsed in the meantime. It is the caller's responsibility >>> + * to make sure that grace period happens, for example, by invoking >>> + * call_srcu() after return from get_state_synchronize_srcu(). >>> + */ >>> +unsigned long get_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp) >>> +{ >>> + // Any prior manipulation of SRCU-protected data must happen >>> + // before the load from ->srcu_gp_seq. >>> + smp_mb(); >>> + return rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq); >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_state_synchronize_srcu); >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * start_poll_synchronize_srcu - Provide cookie and start grace period >>> + * @ssp: srcu_struct to provide cookie for. >>> + * >>> + * This function returns a cookie that can be passed to >>> + * poll_state_synchronize_srcu(), which will return true if a full grace >>> + * period has elapsed in the meantime. Unlike get_state_synchronize_srcu(), >>> + * this function also ensures that any needed SRCU grace period will be >>> + * started. This convenience does come at a cost in terms of CPU overhead. >>> + */ >>> +unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp) >>> +{ >>> + return srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, NULL, true); >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(start_poll_synchronize_srcu); >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * poll_state_synchronize_srcu - Has cookie's grace period ended? >>> + * @ssp: srcu_struct to provide cookie for. >>> + * @cookie: Return value from get_state_synchronize_srcu() or start_poll_synchronize_srcu(). >>> + * >>> + * This function takes the cookie that was returned from either >>> + * get_state_synchronize_srcu() or start_poll_synchronize_srcu(), and >>> + * returns @true if an SRCU grace period elapsed since the time that the >>> + * cookie was created. >>> + */ >>> +bool poll_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, unsigned long cookie) >>> +{ >>> + if (!rcu_seq_done(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq, cookie)) >>> + return false; >>> + smp_mb(); // ^^^ >> >> Minor: Should this comment be more descriptive? > > You have to read between the lines? ;-) :) > How about like this? > Looks good to me! Thanks Neeraj > Thanx, Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > bool poll_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, unsigned long cookie) > { > if (!rcu_seq_done(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq, cookie)) > return false; > // Ensure that the end of the SRCU grace period happens before > // any subsequent code that the caller might execute. > smp_mb(); // ^^^ > return true; > } > -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation