Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:32:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:32:17 -0500 Received: from [208.232.58.25] ([208.232.58.25]:46542 "EHLO kronos.usol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:31:56 -0500 Subject: Re: APM/ACPI From: Sean Middleditch To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.30.16.08 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Nov 2001 13:31:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1004725879.4921.36.camel@smiddle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hmm, not to point fingers or anything, but... "The WindowsXP that came preinstalled supported it!" I dunno, perhaps there is some proprietary protocol? Is ACPI backwards compat with APM? I mean, if the laptop doesn't support APM, would that mean it can't support ACPI? Thanks again, Sean Etc. On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 13:34, Alan Cox wrote: > > I don't see anything regarding ACPI. I also read that ACPI should > > automatically take over APM if support is available. How can I tell if > > I'm not using ACPI because it's not supported, or because it's not > > compiled in? > > Red Hat shipped kernels dont include acpi. The -1% for the battery > percentage does look like the laptop may not support much APM if any > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/