Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:42:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:42:28 -0500 Received: from [208.232.58.25] ([208.232.58.25]:3795 "EHLO kronos.usol.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 13:42:21 -0500 Subject: Re: APM/ACPI From: Sean Middleditch To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.16.99+cvs.2001.10.30.16.08 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Nov 2001 13:41:52 -0500 Message-Id: <1004726512.4921.41.camel@smiddle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org OK, so there's a good chance then that if I compile in ACPI I can have things work OK. Do I need something besides apmd to handle all that? Will stuff like the GNOME battery applet still work? Sean Etc. On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 13:42, Alan Cox wrote: > > I dunno, perhaps there is some proprietary protocol? Is ACPI backwards > > compat with APM? I mean, if the laptop doesn't support APM, would that > > mean it can't support ACPI? > > ACPI and APM are exclusive but a BIOS can contain both. Its up to the OS > not to try and run both together. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/