Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp848128pxu; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 05:49:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyA6017natxDq2hmXxaC2WRscY6+WrP7Ch2y/P96zYGu5WXBiINILKlYia0O6HqIbcZ6enO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1744:: with SMTP id d4mr11618295eje.176.1606139350395; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 05:49:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606139350; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=omBFvjpEpAMREsgh6a7fmlfj39zflRFjFA1+OuTNtnirVHfJMYJGQg0pyeyFFJrjTs zXukXkrYeuEGtcl6JL6rvwjs2yRuF7RZ5qPCi4pXrl1yLEb3UkjtmRdAz2Oay4INh7Th 5CMQubWpz9lhiyaCekq4OaCuRr6RLs4/Tb/WeWRsHY68hc+knD6GahNUB1J+ZmaooVrR lUVczipD1kg1aoQocd9M1kd8d/BJPrAfQdOLFPXGaID0jCHnxAc3hxuG1AzcQ/yskkP1 LXASiGRnWFHtRme+CzkIT6+43eLhB5tS9jvMzu29AKYysNs0y/ho0JeTJRU2zspPwp8n ULLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:ironport-sdr :ironport-sdr; bh=annAUuT5AtD5r4PEjqKQ0bDZTxMnIjqovtpQ5Mprqek=; b=I6RPi1VvLDXZUUqMEjj3MaADf7HkqSqovcIOy3gVZLgTF9M69JwJ/jx9PowqKdILX8 qTmgnOKzZA62/vnewmIaSdTCpulJTporikJShW53sPPcflNpildiLxuZtpnWQ42lQeq9 E7ELCjkH7KrJxcsBGXpIJO9VpSLVR+e42VlwXKZqJxxFeP7eGbUXIDe/1lPTGIXnZKYk j6a6R2swQMsGy0CdIUTeflhxCbsYOTKf7Rpc5KOor5Ey5przrGUwiN0BQx5JWk+BPX6Q 7ywXUmBleVuyPcjLoWvp0mwArGsO5sWPu+BnIXM3sVZdL7l/A48hTTiZrCa3JIIgt5xk jtGQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oo19si6673053ejb.40.2020.11.23.05.48.46; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 05:49:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732498AbgKWNoo (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:44:44 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:34637 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730068AbgKWNoo (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:44:44 -0500 IronPort-SDR: inOmU/AvIQIaX/XWWABsvLuggE5Cy3AjKxBSmJPUKRca+3FU7uVQGm5a6kjjsqrMbOM1gwj57H uM9KFBMwiqwg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9813"; a="151606210" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,363,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="151606210" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Nov 2020 05:44:42 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 0YOEdlhbHllFXV0VXqJrmN57k5zXYl59TpMwgXZEw5gicLXxp0J3EJMiONcmLPyKhBoXftBuvt O4ukTwBlAwQw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,363,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="327201580" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Nov 2020 05:44:40 -0800 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1khCA1-009AUS-TS; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:45:41 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:45:41 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Mark Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Shengjiu Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/38] ASoC: ak5558: drop of_match_ptr from of_device_id table Message-ID: <20201123134541.GG4077@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20201120161653.445521-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20201120165202.GG6751@sirena.org.uk> <20201120194245.GA2925@kozik-lap> <20201120200429.GJ6751@sirena.org.uk> <20201122105813.GA3780@kozik-lap> <20201123104832.GY4077@smile.fi.intel.com> <20201123123731.GA6322@sirena.org.uk> <20201123124129.GA170000@kozik-lap> <20201123134225.GF4077@smile.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20201123134225.GF4077@smile.fi.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 03:42:25PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 01:41:29PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:37:31PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:48:32PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:59:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:04:29PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > > Surely if that's the desired outcome the fix is to change the definition > > > > > > of of_match_ptr() such that it leaves the reference with CONFIG_ACPI, > > > > > > perhaps hidden behind a config option for PRP0001? That seems better > > > > > > than going through the entire tree like this. > > > > > > > > That could be indeed an easier way to achieve this. > > > > > > > ...easier and wrong in my opinion. Not all drivers need that. > > > > What the point to touch it in the driver which is OF-only? > > > > (For IP which will quite unlikely to be present in ACPI world) > > > > Or if the device will get the correct ACPI ID? > > > > > > That feels like something that should be done with Kconfig dependencies > > > like a direct OF dependency (possibly a !PRP0001 dependency?) for the > > > driver or possibly with having a variant of_match_ptr() for things that > > > really don't want to support PRP0001. Just removing all the use of > > > of_match_ptr() is both noisy and confusing in that it looks like it's > > > creating issues to fix, it makes it hard to understand when and why one > > > should use the macro. > > > > For the OF-only drivers (without other ID table), there is no point to > > use the macro. Driver can bind only with DT, so what is the point of > > of_match_ptr? To skip the OF table when building without OF? Driver > > won't be usable at all in such case. So maybe for compile testing? > > There is no need to remove OF table for simple build tests. > > I'm on the same page here. I should have elaborated that under OF only I meant rather !ACPI. So, when it has no ID tables, I agree that macro is not needed. But, for instance, I?C device drivers tend to have table even for ->probe_new() callback to be able to instantiate them via user space. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko