Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp895361pxu; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:51:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoPzvEYNlalxaHnQAISVAVuRXVoTRJD2B4ZAamW/jflOok0mrSmonIcvaY64q9YiBjmjor X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d407:: with SMTP id z7mr48636861edq.234.1606143072198; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:51:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606143072; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BmBWOrEyiLWrkE/piaZFZZ7CFdFKGVZxU8NonS5xHwu+EIbKLtDesUlnsrsdOWs1QY Gl+FUI/syDMzJ59b+EOxcBAjej0Qsvn4WJhk4i03qUxpltqm74BvPkBuvIEUZ2EzJjOT SAFxS5pPK0zrcA9QmBLdZYzZln4/3QGWpaYACz76yq/DrTd8r1VQ5qTycdA78XHetJrQ /Nn2bLnWq3ecv69KTzwPwnMTryBcTE36CAmBSFaAI20eFthhlgxMzBUBm2EAMlUuKRwD oYuUJyqN50COyqRUEbfCZxkWkNveTHFaNoJIiNi6ARhna6ZLTnM4b2/6rAZCVuTHAaiS 9h9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=Jx0e387EU8Y8QGi626Zz2QkBXc0rICaXyds9sJ3z3xc=; b=Z9Fh1gqjxdjQvcOXhs37rhVEFvuS/NGZ9wVpXAFcQEKwpK2Duqiw7yMijn16icLVeJ sR50pa4DxzPP24zbd90rW2d2qmaRbu8ofhZIjf44sTew2Vx7gaRHbEWGPZEyeDZwQm4E E0XBB5ql8yIkN2sCcxExcZwMhXXYdvbDAUOevCg0guRx1j5a3HOAYIwcWKeLMQvJcNX9 4bkg2OHnIXPCiKorQvG2ZH1/H3GavM56xNmGrYESppdsHe+7N3AcFeVM/NIEP82geGre cl6X57hZTU26Rz2hIDzKkSDVLOQDETpqJPIo7Uj2FrarvyZn+BTFf9k7d3rqMMEi/ooo 68nA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=iUx6CnHw; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a3si6802852edq.430.2020.11.23.06.50.48; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:51:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=iUx6CnHw; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728662AbgKWOtR (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:49:17 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:60399 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728972AbgKWOtQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:49:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606142954; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Jx0e387EU8Y8QGi626Zz2QkBXc0rICaXyds9sJ3z3xc=; b=iUx6CnHwKEHjgKXOgGgF3CSepsWWVCdCaFDvvWHXy8kcCXc0sRx+1yTcN8NexhEl1wxSLP r6OkVb2tfR6CGsoujjRj4grvSVOdFbO7v8wUvnnY5Guhc5Vm9nlU7CT2HhnztncwWcDYz6 f94OFGwDc3ZxrH/cU61FJdFuIG7IIsY= Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com (mail-ej1-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-317-hMTp-9tIPwCQLKS050Ts0Q-1; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:49:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: hMTp-9tIPwCQLKS050Ts0Q-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id a13so5327692ejv.17 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:49:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jx0e387EU8Y8QGi626Zz2QkBXc0rICaXyds9sJ3z3xc=; b=ai03se6xZQ+zmafq9gsOh6RBNyfxekq7+UBZeQtdwye+d7MDQoFGYA4HoqgWM63nCu ACh3gjnIXI32765BolwY6xmb/ODs883P2nqjJd8j86VJtrX/MYyxoN0QwDS17SYSZHor Jdef8obHihvVyBontHe/KGq/uh6p/34Yv9vCeqDxTfrHKaenRtf30Pk6s8xIoI05Mm+A vs0XgUT180gtxukRjoOIjP0iwfH/bUGUBzoE/atrT1LAVZFPVhFYSJcX+p67tRiptpEn R4TE2af+83mJS5Y2UecZB503SDZhloxnwp1Ei+iLnr/jhZ98Kue2jKF/AHaY5UUEyN2f jJQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tcEbe3AH7JWbkJvnCcsCVRrnhQbZf4QDCtFz4ehYnQTEoJK5L ZSmyosNRkA5xRYtAsvykAn99a0DxKfUqv0suAMYU5FR/nwvsLXF6jIyRvnJGvU40kudOhTp+esH Ci+pp7wiV0orBnPV/jZ/8xB5T X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:34c3:: with SMTP id h3mr44342899ejb.132.1606142951014; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:49:11 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:34c3:: with SMTP id h3mr44342885ejb.132.1606142950839; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:49:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from x1.localdomain (2001-1c00-0c0c-fe00-6c10-fbf3-14c4-884c.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c0c:fe00:6c10:fbf3:14c4:884c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm5094947ejz.74.2020.11.23.06.49.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:49:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: 5.10 regression, many XHCI swiotlb buffer is full / DMAR: Device bounce map failed errors on thunderbolt connected XHCI controller From: Hans de Goede To: Mathias Nyman , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-usb , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org References: Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:49:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, +Cc Christoph Hellwig Christoph, this is still an issue, so I've been looking around a bit and think this might have something to do with the dma-mapping-5.10 changes. Do you have any suggestions to debug this, or is it time to do a git bisect on this before 5.10 ships with regression? Regards, Hans On 11/10/20 12:36 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > Not sure if this is a XHCI driver problem at all, but I needed to start > somewhere with reporting this so I went with: > > scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c > > And added a Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org as bonus. > > I'm seeing the following errors and very slow network performance with > the USB NIC in a Lenovo Thunderbolt gen 2 dock. > > Note that the USB NIC is connected to the XHCI controller which is > embedded inside the dock and is connected over thunderbolt! > > So the errors are: > > [ 1148.744205] swiotlb_tbl_map_single: 6 callbacks suppressed > [ 1148.744210] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 16 (slots) > [ 1148.744218] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 16ea@1411c0000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1148.744226] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > [ 1148.744368] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 16 (slots) > [ 1148.744375] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 16ea@10aabc000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1148.744381] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > [ 1148.745141] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 16 (slots) > [ 1148.745148] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 118e@1411c0000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1148.745155] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > [ 1148.951282] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 16 (slots) > [ 1148.951388] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 118e@140988000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1148.951420] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > [ 1151.013342] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 16 (slots) > [ 1151.013357] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 1d2a@1411c0000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1151.013373] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > [ 1151.018660] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 18 (slots) > [ 1151.018696] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 11da@1411c0000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1151.018711] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > [ 1151.223022] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 16 (slots) > [ 1151.223102] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 11da@10aabc000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1151.223133] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > [ 1151.228810] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 16 (slots) > [ 1151.228870] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 11da@10aabc000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1151.228898] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > [ 1151.234792] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 8192 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 16 (slots) > [ 1151.234852] xhci_hcd 0000:0a:00.0: DMAR: Device bounce map: 11da@10aabc000 dir 1 --- failed > [ 1151.234882] r8152 4-2.1.2:1.0 ens1u2u1u2: failed tx_urb -11 > > etc. > > This happens as soon as I generate any serious amount of outgoing network traffic. E.g. rsyncing files > to another machine. > > Regards, > > Hans >