Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422814AbWHYTfq (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:35:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422815AbWHYTfp (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:35:45 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:43461 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422814AbWHYTfp (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:35:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 2) From: Daniel Walker To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@osdl.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au In-Reply-To: <44EF4EED.2040904@linux.intel.com> References: <1156504939.3032.26.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1156520608.10471.5.camel@c-67-188-28-158.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <44EF4EED.2040904@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:35:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1156534542.10471.13.camel@c-67-188-28-158.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 770 Lines: 20 On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 21:26 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > The name space here is bugging me a little. Maybe prefix them with > > "pm_latency" so you'd have "pm_latency_set_acceptable()" , > > "pm_latency_modify_acceptable()" , something like that. Likewise with > > the file names , "include/linux/pm_latency.h" > > > > there is no reason why this should JUST be about power management.... I'm just suggesting it would be nice to have a clear prefix on each function. It's up to you what that prefix is. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/