Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201123153817.1616814-1-ciorneiioana@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201123153817.1616814-1-ciorneiioana@gmail.com>
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:13:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFBinCBhWKzQFwERW9cy7T4JdOdFwNOqn2qPqFpqdjbat=-DwA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] net: phy: add support for shared
 interrupts (part 3)
To:     Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@gmail.com>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hello Ioana,

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:38 PM Ioana Ciornei <ciorneiioana@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> Ioana Ciornei (15):
>   net: phy: intel-xway: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
>   net: phy: intel-xway: remove the use of .ack_interrupt()
>   net: phy: icplus: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
>   net: phy: icplus: remove the use .ack_interrupt()
>   net: phy: meson-gxl: implement generic .handle_interrupt() callback
>   net: phy: meson-gxl: remove the use of .ack_callback()
I will check the six patches above on Saturday (due to me being very
busy with my daytime job)
if that's too late for the netdev maintainers then I'm not worried
about it. at first glance this looks fine to me. and we can always fix
things afterwards (but still before -rc1).


Best regards,
Martin