Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964918AbWHYULh (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:11:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964937AbWHYULh (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:11:37 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.4]:64712 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964918AbWHYULg (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:11:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/6] Lost bits - fix PG_writeback vs PG_private race in NFS From: Trond Myklebust To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel In-Reply-To: <1156523815.16027.43.camel@taijtu> References: <20060825153709.24254.28118.sendpatchset@twins> <1156523815.16027.43.camel@taijtu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:11:27 -0400 Message-Id: <1156536687.5927.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.148, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 1.85, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 20 On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 18:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Make sure we clear PG_writeback after we clear PG_private, otherwise > weird and wonderfull stuff will happen. > NACK. Look carefully at the case of unstable writes: your patch does nothing to guarantee that PG_writeback is cleared after PG_private for that case. Anyhow, you don't explain exactly what is wrong with clearing PG_writeback before PG_private. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/