Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1358314pxu; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:05:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykel+Jsc5O+N7BtZxRNBO//mnRlR8kgF26vAKdSniRbTjeFJHDkM8BYeja2VbO55RA+S5J X-Received: by 2002:a50:f148:: with SMTP id z8mr2252036edl.386.1606190704963; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:05:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606190704; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DKjcZ+jKVx3QdX1kvFUWlbDayI4KvRiN2NKvuIlZgKtlJ/lEZjqnIFLlaCSSyiAHRX jGCWzjrVx9XTlHJ+/eG6wFO1LivXZX4Yh7WcfVv16iryTv50LxVlaNuRYh8maINrys7e ZT9qf9yvVpNRhx6Jb27cOgO72BSZL/bcgk5nBwNySPR9ZIUansQ10qX+zl+m42reWu3b 3L5hgBx6tm90XQRuYEQSFjsfgJMSsOH7heGOK46EaxvOa5ZPZwiAej58TOIgUBhD3fdD QRk0h1BaTsS9WGx17UMkxAiUIS74Pjw6J80UVBp9FsgQE+AkKZTHmwi+FI5tBzcOVDjQ bbIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=g7j9kpyzYVbFqBTp8yoRooFvKTkwE619SUxdNJVGQRQ=; b=s5rIgqgb1opjDUssgYlCSJUwd8xN1dzShmX3JBmK7b2FviR3YKHYTHUKXt8q3XgTJH PTz5PRn2zbw9OYEPljwhNjKG+aKlHV7WzIAfDadUki/BswWV3EFt9SusXiEwXg76Soco FGu0vf4n8j8es+YXIKZzjLUwaBuLIFCRbl7SlJHZCjvTaKAlkDcYrfRZcAaZvmO3JAGJ Ybi0xBeY7732uBgZQJxbXTqDciLvsHo/ho0MhGunpLKsXk1TIrXORPRbzCXDAMunuNPh hSeiXbSojifJN2P0F/wiCvb6345WJBxalQr6dOG9R06yknH8yHaIiw7BZJHWRV7h8E4O joUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vTkVb7PF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lj24si7686131ejb.612.2020.11.23.20.04.41; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:05:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=vTkVb7PF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727976AbgKXECY (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:02:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727438AbgKXECY (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:02:24 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com (mail-pg1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA3A7C0613CF; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:02:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id t21so16283336pgl.3; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:02:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=g7j9kpyzYVbFqBTp8yoRooFvKTkwE619SUxdNJVGQRQ=; b=vTkVb7PFtRqYIZ5Zv1Jf5dMl/oOBJmbGzi0fYInd/MsVy7sJKhpuagB6ipZMP6PdEV W77wWWisCl7TH/zAfAvEgjkQH/sLXhr9Pp/8lRLkanw9gAs+BYfg1S+iPYEa/Fjvdulo 7A4EL1yQBT6S/EoZ/qD5vGya7bmY1OfpDf0wB8oFTmlJv1yZqYXQ9GuaCTSiY/LAoKul o5uo+0ROQOXSZlxaoudePfSlVJP3LVgkdqE8O4tCGhZOQkcL3dvkSQ7I4kGnbHTmUIRy Pv4CBLYTwv+q6Smyb4kYYfrSkWzi6FfLZpPv9jH/7JalJESOeSrHSvGEC6goXB72RHDN EZgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=g7j9kpyzYVbFqBTp8yoRooFvKTkwE619SUxdNJVGQRQ=; b=eZIWyIYvdZn6GrlJRXibpdBQhwO/bsr0OWHIuAp9fWdyi88Wt0kD19pTHnhZRoHY5Q aHDvHKPOVlh5g47N/bott8dgpZgLKHAv2ifdlay+KYKBFZFftaefq2FDOrv6rqq5qruw x3kaBgKgq5YvAUVoDBX/WL8eLEH2n5gS1T8tcED+0RInfK3J+TCWFMXv9Ml9AuZK/dTF LOdM5yfGWLlpfC3DYy5dO7PeeR25wPekJVFZ/zHGQEf8DXPUY59ar+K1/M45Q8BvHucC cMnzxjMsgHRLZPVDjpSvpCKr1lHW+DsZMMUhHDvESd+OSqw2r7NnlmvFm5i1pTmG8oXW h1Kg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/l5PSRANFPXj7ym2XntL4Rd011lpo+ftj/QGgLfFb4uX57gdc 7O8GENyj+BtQczYhlE7tGebGIhzmuyQ= X-Received: by 2002:a62:cd0d:0:b029:18b:a1cc:a5be with SMTP id o13-20020a62cd0d0000b029018ba1cca5bemr2348242pfg.67.1606190543378; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:02:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ast-mbp ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:2397]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 145sm11942774pga.11.2020.11.23.20.02.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:02:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:02:20 -0800 From: Alexei Starovoitov To: KP Singh Cc: James Morris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Florent Revest , Brendan Jackman , Mimi Zohar Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Add a BPF helper for getting the IMA hash of an inode Message-ID: <20201124040220.oyajc7wqn7gqgyib@ast-mbp> References: <20201120131708.3237864-1-kpsingh@chromium.org> <20201120131708.3237864-2-kpsingh@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201120131708.3237864-2-kpsingh@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:17:07PM +0000, KP Singh wrote: > + > +static bool bpf_ima_inode_hash_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog) > +{ > + return bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(prog->aux->attach_btf_id); > +} > + > +BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_ima_inode_hash_btf_ids, struct, inode) > + > +const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto = { > + .func = bpf_ima_inode_hash, > + .gpl_only = false, > + .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, > + .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID, > + .arg1_btf_id = &bpf_ima_inode_hash_btf_ids[0], > + .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM, > + .arg3_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO, > + .allowed = bpf_ima_inode_hash_allowed, > +}; > + > static const struct bpf_func_proto * > bpf_lsm_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) > { > @@ -97,6 +121,8 @@ bpf_lsm_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) > return &bpf_task_storage_delete_proto; > case BPF_FUNC_bprm_opts_set: > return &bpf_bprm_opts_set_proto; > + case BPF_FUNC_ima_inode_hash: > + return &bpf_ima_inode_hash_proto; That's not enough for correctness. Not only hook has to sleepable, but the program has to be sleepable too. The patch 3 should be causing all sort of kernel warnings for calling mutex from preempt disabled. There it calls bpf_ima_inode_hash() from SEC("lsm/file_mprotect") program. "lsm/" is non-sleepable. "lsm.s/" is. please enable CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y in your config.