Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@opencontainers.org,
        corbet@lwn.net, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] syscalls: Document OCI seccomp filter interactions &
 workaround
References: <87lfer2c0b.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
        <20201124133719.GA30896@infradead.org>
        <87k0ua26gm.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
        <20201124164659.GB14094@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:52:48 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20201124164659.GB14094@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's
        message of "Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:46:59 +0000")
Message-ID: <87y2iqzogv.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

* Christoph Hellwig:

> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:08:09PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Do you categorically reject the general advice, or specific instances as
>> well?
>
> All of the above.  Really, if people decided to use seccompt to return
> nonsensical error codes we should not work around that in new kernel
> ABIs.

Fair enough, I can work with that.  Thanks.

Florian
-- 
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill