Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v4 2/8] genirq/irqdomain: Clean legacy IRQ
 allocation
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= <clg@kaod.org>,
        Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Such=c3=a1nek?= <msuchanek@suse.de>,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT" 
        <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
References: <20201124061720.86766-1-aik@ozlabs.ru>
 <20201124061720.86766-3-aik@ozlabs.ru>
 <CAHp75VfV4mG23C9Ep1vNLk2oBjB=LTQGyU=fhWPhw4PX-Ci-7A@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Message-ID: <38b803db-2d67-dfa0-7e7b-e4ce816576ad@ozlabs.ru>
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:56:36 +1100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/84.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfV4mG23C9Ep1vNLk2oBjB=LTQGyU=fhWPhw4PX-Ci-7A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 11/24/20 8:19 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:20 AM Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
>>
>> There are 10 users of __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() and only one - IOAPIC -
>> passes realloc==true. There is no obvious reason for handling this
>> specific case in the generic code.
>>
>> This splits out __irq_domain_alloc_irqs_data() to make it clear what
>> IOAPIC does and makes __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() cleaner.
>>
>> This should cause no behavioral change.
> 
>> +       ret = __irq_domain_alloc_irqs_data(domain, virq, nr_irqs, node, arg, affinity);
>> +       if (ret <= 0)
>>                  goto out_free_desc;
> 
> Was or wasn't 0 considered as error code previously?

Oh. I need to clean this up, the idea is since this does not allocate 
IRQs, this should return error code and not an irq, I'll make this explicit.

> 
>>          return virq;
> 
>>   out_free_desc:
>>          irq_free_descs(virq, nr_irqs);
>>          return ret;
> 

-- 
Alexey