Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: cang=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:53:37 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
Cc:     asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
        hongwus@codeaurora.org, ziqichen@codeaurora.org,
        rnayak@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@android.com, saravanak@google.com, salyzyn@google.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Refector ufshcd_setup_clocks() to
 remove skip_ref_clk
In-Reply-To: <9070660d115dd96c70bc3cc90d5c7dab833f36a8.camel@gmail.com>
References: <1606202906-14485-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
 <1606202906-14485-2-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
 <9070660d115dd96c70bc3cc90d5c7dab833f36a8.camel@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d112935400a5ef115a384a4c753b6d04@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-11-25 05:09, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 23:28 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>> @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ struct ufs_dev_cmd {
>>   * @max_freq: maximum frequency supported by the clock
>>   * @min_freq: min frequency that can be used for clock scaling
>>   * @curr_freq: indicates the current frequency that it is set to
>> + * @always_on_while_link_active: indicate that the clk should not be
>> disabled if
>> +                                link is still active
>>   * @enabled: variable to check against multiple enable/disable
>>   */
>>  struct ufs_clk_info {
>> @@ -238,6 +240,7 @@ struct ufs_clk_info {
>>         u32 max_freq;
>>         u32 min_freq;
>>         u32 curr_freq;
>> +       bool always_on_while_link_active;
> 
> Can,
> using a sentence as a parameter name looks a little bit clumsy to me.
> The meaning has been explained in the comments section. How about
> simplify it and in line with other parameters in the structure?
> 

Do you have a better name in mind?

Thanks,

Can Guo.

> Thanks,
> Bean
> 
>>         bool enabled;
>>  };
>>