Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduced new Cadence USBSSP DRD Driver.
To:     Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
CC:     "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "balbi@kernel.org" <balbi@kernel.org>,
        "colin.king@canonical.com" <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        "rogerq@ti.com" <rogerq@ti.com>, Rahul Kumar <kurahul@cadence.com>,
        "Govindraju, Aswath" <a-govindraju@ti.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
References: <20201119141307.8342-1-pawell@cadence.com>
 <20201124075023.GC32310@b29397-desktop>
 <DM6PR07MB55299F262CEA81216999CB05DDFB0@DM6PR07MB5529.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Message-ID: <45ffc5f8-f9de-e14d-3d03-9ef1f1c848d9@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:05:59 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR07MB55299F262CEA81216999CB05DDFB0@DM6PR07MB5529.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 24/11/20 2:51 PM, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
> Peter,
> 
>> On 20-11-19 15:12:57, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
>>> This patch introduce new Cadence USBSS DRD driver to linux kernel.
>>>
>>> The Cadence USBSS DRD Controller is a highly configurable IP Core which
>>> can be instantiated as Dual-Role Device (DRD), Peripheral Only and
>>> Host Only (XHCI)configurations.
>>>
>>> The current driver has been validated with FPGA burned. We have support
>>> for PCIe bus, which is used on FPGA prototyping.
>>>
>>> The host side of USBSS-DRD controller is compliance with XHCI
>>> specification, so it works with standard XHCI Linux driver.
>>>
>>> The device side of USBSS DRD controller is compliant with XHCI.
>>> The architecture for device side is almost the same as for host side,
>>> and most of the XHCI specification can be used to understand how
>>> this controller operates.
>>>
>>> This controller and driver support Full Speed, Hight Speed, Supper Speed
>>> and Supper Speed Plus USB protocol.
>>>
>>> The prefix cdnsp used in driver has chosen by analogy to cdn3 driver.
>>> The last letter of this acronym means PLUS. The formal name of controller
>>> is USBSSP but it's to generic so I've decided to use CDNSP.
>>>
>>> The patch 1: adds support for DRD CDNSP.
>>> The patch 2: separates common code that can be reusable by cdnsp driver.
>>> The patch 3: moves reusable code to separate module.
>>> The patch 4: changes prefixes in reusable code from cdns3 to common cdns.
>>> The patch 5: adopts gadget_dev pointer in cdns structure to make possible
>>>              use it in both drivers.
>>> The patches 6-8: add the main part of driver and has been intentionally
>>>              split into 3 part. In my opinion such division should not
>>>              affect understanding and reviewing the driver, and cause that
>>>              main patch (7/8) is little smaller. Patch 6 introduces main
>>>              header file for driver, 7 is the main part that implements all
>>>              functionality of driver and 8 introduces tracepoints.
>>> The patch 9: Adds cdns3 prefixes to files related with USBSS driver.
>>> the patch 10: Adds USBSSP DRD IP driver entry to MAINTAINERS file.
>>>
>>> Changlog from v2:
>>> - removed not used pdev parameter from cdnsp_read/wite_64 functions
>>> - fixed incorrect value assigned to CDNSP_ENDPOINTS_NUM (32 -> 31)
>>> - replaced some constant value with CDNSP_ENDPOINTS_NUM macro
>>> - replaced 'true' with '1' in bits description in cdnsp-gadget.h file
>>> - fixed some typos
>>> - some other less important changes suggested by Peter Chen
>>
>> Hi Pawel,
>>
>> I have updated my -next tree as the latest usb-next tree which v5.10-rc4
>> is included, would you please rebase my tree and send again, I could apply your
>> patches and test, if test could pass, I will apply it to my -next tree.
>> You don't need to rebase again since it is a huge patch set, will take some
>> efforts for rebase.
>>
> 
> I'll try to post it tomorrow.

Pawel, have you tested TI J7 for regressions after this series? After
your latest changes, can you post a tree which someone in TI can test?

Thanks,
Sekhar