Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp45515pxu; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:07:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8hRYOSqtHC9YJvoBRZF2mWmWEpNkJOmsXIT0+atLFBFwSoCwG+WVHLtLcNCznt2F+JKrC X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:7ce:: with SMTP id u14mr1417428edy.19.1606270042360; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:07:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606270042; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zmjVRpNS2aqrVkZRpSAnXZ7VBnWl2XovGsOxhYnTW2vNgcotaDN7KN2zj00Lhgh/iQ 6Kmxa7aNvN1QfEIVZDsTq/cd5SoQ8ek+FHfSDO3M4evWNMpjSTbyAFCn85mwZaZXe3FH nH6ZDzbRLiOEz4Kx2qbFeY4z9hYFKGWhKibAGCcZi5gOh5OKtHRSN831qyKEVJkg6Ktq dPSFrgfb1U6XEAP9cKzTDUSqwJzwV1RYRTl8r15uYQio/RO8fEPS+f5smJYc1OMic8Ln koutm9WpEL2vu1edd2bibbEqd+o48C2NdjSNKhwI+TN64Dik33b646cmzCTu3jVZMWq8 yR9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=DhzmipILTp7QfmdHQdap7LGDy0T1N4ZphYRLkoro4m4=; b=nDoBY7XgUQ/XQv2Nb8dx6hdgETzE9eYgCco2bOevAlwqFRn6PStOdr4X85D/oKTErb vK+icqMoT+gBYDBq7gsrz3yIYKDJm5GwLjNJiI/kX9iGn11G3HhE8dX813f6BTc0BoQz 7n+/VvqYGKgqPzMQAkZTYZClbYZ6wuqyhVqDh20gQxD19Z8oA66IyFoT+Ekr5p2+NarZ TW4VHcz2MIOjGSc4DImSMCPyTSh0LSwMlTrYkfgljTqsoQsE2FsayByc989IfDLu1mB9 0G4Gb1D1B9lCJHcVvPwPgTPOz6bncCPDP0FbLYi43TU2klMYb6JesQGA9Qpoc64/jwah NbaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w9si454569ejj.45.2020.11.24.18.06.59; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:07:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733302AbgKXOMP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:12:15 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2146 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727123AbgKXOMP (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:12:15 -0500 Received: from fraeml709-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CgQsK14sSz67H8y; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 22:10:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) by fraeml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:12:12 +0100 Received: from [10.210.169.36] (10.210.169.36) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:12:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] sbitmap: optimise sbitmap_deferred_clear() To: Pavel Begunkov , Jens Axboe , , Omar Sandoval CC: References: From: John Garry Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:11:51 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.210.169.36] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/11/2020 15:35, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > Because of spinlocks and atomics sbitmap_deferred_clear() have to reload > &sb->map[index] on each access even though the map address won't change. > Pass in sbitmap_word instead of {sb, index}, so it's cached in a > variable. It also improves code generation of > sbitmap_find_bit_in_index(). > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov Looks ok, even though a bit odd not be passing a struct sbitmap * now Reviewed-by: John Garry