Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp321687pxu; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:14:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtdE5Qy5bgDFAF378t2nLg2uNik9tpB36VJbfwrHAgMgiQdYcbi4j/hyZHpm6Lg68LDM27 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3953:: with SMTP id g19mr2779734eje.151.1606306453127; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:14:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606306453; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z8/jnq7dMvQn5Vw3702IlwsMfHA9vrFhQjr7Zae6Iau8q+DOsZhalCO3Vjoa90vgVB ZlZ2Rsjhzjj6pJ2LTOH6kVo/+EQjZKfCaMRBIDz/BT0Y3qGhBk+TNzm6WoURjcRT+QoV 4N1jdOG13EEhDSOFsoVdc5jhj/vVpBCAfssKNOQ7qurlHrdj8UK1pwecGKohl9sGf9xz w/YSV8nRL++vcxZKv5I3lkp4vbqAlGMSfgu+297BPRqJw/IwR3XoSpCQhiw4p2UI1q9d Th8QZAkUY3tdZAtmRKzJ8FVC/TwborHPvCPn7QuVUgc+RR8F9zD6xww8c/pTvilvhR7Z ef9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=tJZHC6137uQUG8RKPb1dol8HSxgZMOUWtark59mf2wI=; b=MGPHERQ98qjIvHl/xMSth85+RW+m3P2MrsBelgsK12WYvSUw3m7YIVrtw8bXpOG2de nlMgUV0Bz9GcSErFZMbbw/TvKjeXYCuVShikWgAXC8HhHcDTljdQBL3uUw73z6L1rggn UIFb+zud38bC+JTmGmzLiKJyITXXOYNYTCPm0VZO2ARNYMMZnGVDt2L2FCmmUvmUSsb9 lrHSerGfYzEyZfSpNeBd5p1cYjDIdkJOv9QhJE44yoxpK/tTEYg4ET3/fN6MeCaI+Jm7 BFcJha7sbzuY6BS2SCRKlZAHiWb7qc3GGAwj0dkQ/Qu/MljcgdfwZlnnrS0SZZp+PkQx /x/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Dz5WMozo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a15si1371467eju.683.2020.11.25.04.13.49; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Dz5WMozo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729114AbgKYMMd (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:12:33 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:47644 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728976AbgKYMMc (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:12:32 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0APC1MRH068941; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:11:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=tJZHC6137uQUG8RKPb1dol8HSxgZMOUWtark59mf2wI=; b=Dz5WMozo2vUGDh7A4Gjbkl4xbnkyJNqtzWYBzd6hnalu9/HdWbkTyWG46xEGCKwANBYD n9UVHcO/5rlx2RFcs5DdcygFL5C9TlEL28hYlAKY2m3rutu+rur3Cv0/LgdAAN++jrst Xhs88kRph/l7UY0/rCv70Rt7gXs5YjtnmxBp9lmYTwn7EYFsANP/3fKwIO3QGDnz3Igz akoVFnMZtzsic6aSz7PqLvUuXEOihVJdzL+Lj340Pt5nqDKR+S9PD0SPJMwfgMXAM/HM u7YarQUsM05nyGFrBxB9eBtEwBimmwzq/BapYj3b5vMMkFJ0aPRcQ0JMHVDg4aEb0Z5B Sw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 351nr6k6xd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:11:49 -0500 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 0APC1Q7i069152; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:11:49 -0500 Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 351nr6k6wg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:11:48 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0APC8Z10008030; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:11:46 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 34xth8acey-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:11:46 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0APCBiZO2097800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:11:44 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B669A4040; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:11:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A075A405E; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:11:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.183.229]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:11:40 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:11:38 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Mike Rapoport , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Christopher Lameter , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , Elena Reshetova , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Mark Rutland , Michael Kerrisk , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Peter Zijlstra , Rick Edgecombe , Roman Gushchin , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Tycho Andersen , Will Deacon , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually enabled Message-ID: <20201125121138.GJ123287@linux.ibm.com> References: <20201125092208.12544-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20201125092208.12544-5-rppt@kernel.org> <5ea6eacd-79e8-0645-da39-d3461f60e627@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5ea6eacd-79e8-0645-da39-d3461f60e627@redhat.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312,18.0.737 definitions=2020-11-25_06:2020-11-25,2020-11-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=852 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011250072 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:22:52PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > #include > > > > #endif /* __ASM_CACHEFLUSH_H */ > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..ecb6b0f449ab > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > > + > > +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_SET_MEMORY_H > > +#define _ASM_ARM64_SET_MEMORY_H > > + > > +#include > > + > > +bool can_set_direct_map(void); > > +#define can_set_direct_map can_set_direct_map > > Well, that looks weird. > [...] We have a lot of those e.g. in linux/pgtable.h > > } > > +#else /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP */ > > +/* > > + * Some architectures, e.g. ARM64 can disable direct map modifications at > > + * boot time. Let them overrive this query. > > + */ > > +#ifndef can_set_direct_map > > +static inline bool can_set_direct_map(void) > > +{ > > + return true; > > +} > > I think we prefer __weak functions for something like that, avoids the > ifdefery. I'd prefer this for two reasons: first, static inline can be optimized away and second, there is no really good place to put generic implementation. > Apart from that, LGTM. > > -- > Thanks, > > David / dhildenb > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.