Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201020085940.13875-1-sjpark@amazon.com> <20201020085940.13875-2-sjpark@amazon.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201020085940.13875-2-sjpark@amazon.com>
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 07:29:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CALvZod5rALTNRzK2w-y7AJMxFfBV9upJECPvCjhF=iFcDFt-5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 01/18] mm: Introduce Data Access MONitor (DAMON)
To:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, acme@kernel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, amit@kernel.org,
        benh@kernel.crashing.org, brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, dwmw@amazon.com,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, "Du, Fan" <fan.du@intel.com>,
        foersleo@amazon.de, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, jolsa@redhat.com,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, namhyung@kernel.org,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, sblbir@amazon.com,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, sj38.park@gmail.com,
        snu@amazon.de, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>, zgf574564920@gmail.com,
        linux-damon@amazon.com, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:01 AM SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
>
> DAMON is a data access monitoring framework for the Linux kernel.  The
> core mechanisms of DAMON make it
>
>  - accurate (the monitoring output is useful enough for DRAM level
>    performance-centric memory management; It might be inappropriate for
>    CPU Cache levels, though),
>  - light-weight (the monitoring overhead is normally low enough to be
>    applied online), and
>  - scalable (the upper-bound of the overhead is in constant range
>    regardless of the size of target workloads).
>
> Using this framework, hence, we can easily write efficient kernel space
> data access monitoring applications.  For example, the kernel's memory
> management mechanisms can make advanced decisions using this.
> Experimental data access aware optimization works that incurring high
> access monitoring overhead could implemented again on top of this.
>
> Due to its simple and flexible interface, providing user space interface
> would be also easy.  Then, user space users who have some special
> workloads can write personalized applications for better understanding
> and optimizations of their workloads and systems.
>
> That said, this commit is implementing only basic data structures and
> simple manipulation functions of the structures.  The core mechanisms of
> DAMON will be implemented by following commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
> Reviewed-by: Leonard Foerster <foersleo@amazon.de>
> Reviewed-by: Varad Gautam <vrd@amazon.de>

I don't see any benefit of this patch on its own. Some of this should
be part of the main damon context patch. I would suggest to separate
the core (damon context) from the target related structs (target,
region, addr range).

Also I would prefer the code be added with the actual usage otherwise
it is hard to review.

> ---
[snip]
> +unsigned int damon_nr_regions(struct damon_target *t)
> +{
> +       struct damon_region *r;
> +       unsigned int nr_regions = 0;
> +
> +       damon_for_each_region(r, t)
> +               nr_regions++;
> +
> +       return nr_regions;
> +}

Why not keep a count instead of traversing to get the size?