Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750711AbWH0Kta (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:49:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750720AbWH0Kta (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:49:30 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:51098 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711AbWH0Kta (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:49:30 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Peter" Subject: Re: wrt: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20060827071131.GC6932@bitwizard.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-151-204-7-242.pskn.east.verizon.net X-Archive: encrypt User-Agent: pan 0.109 (Beable) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1655 Lines: 37 On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:11:31 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 04:12:52PM +0000, Peter wrote: >> Diagnostics on the drives are fine. Removing the b drive removes the >> messages. System functions fine anyway, and no data is lost as a result >> of the errors. The persistence of it is frustrating! > > What diagnostics did you try? > First badblocks, then Manufacturer's (Maxtor) overnight burn in tests. > (I've got experience with a guy saying: "I have 5 which test perfect > with my diagnostics, but my embedded machine refuses them. What's > wrong?" All of them report through SMART that they HAVE reported media > errors, and they all have bad blocks.) I tried to be more careful before posting here :). I even ran a second test on the drives on a second machine. > > Do you have "smartd" running? I vaguely remember that it sometimes > triggered error messages from the normal driver. > No, but I think there is a driver issue such as VMW or the reiserfs. Reiser even mentions this error on his faq suggesting it's a bad ide cable. Of course, I changed mine (now testing #4). Of course, switching to NO preempt has reduced the volume of errors greatly. Even last night there were none for the time being. thx. -- Peter +++++ Do not reply to this email, it is a spam trap and not monitored. I can be reached via this list, or via jabber: pete4abw at jabber.org ICQ: 73676357 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/