Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp208299pxu; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:48:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdN6Ir1gbNMFS2Kc6XkzQ+bgusw62mmG/8/Q0LqNJYHt1ESeDzG2IEoVgl+HHjjI/t1ME5 X-Received: by 2002:a50:e786:: with SMTP id b6mr439749edn.242.1606355309290; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:48:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606355309; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZX9+3UEryeEivKbf+rHNsaB8ja8ZY4fLbsafacbKkruXEAdty3YQfMrsWY+5n8GikG 7GnOU3Vw8HK5nuzA3Z7m8mhR3RLV4G5tfwZry1dBcaCDdiDFB87gDU6xI/YosOtbb9Ec evRXbf31Yv0H8U39dKEdpQiXIrS7SYkdKhiBQQOKyRVydXJMn9shfO56CWfCl9mF1GgK +Vkb6DapdXwguJEJBq73qjNgzarzWK8Go9DK+BGDb9grdrHa950Z/nUpkHeQuPGDpJr1 XZJ6tJ/EsyL95eNpCK/Kx9ul9fxtzPUOShqz4V7Qk0LlzKgGaUwk9OzS9ve8mM6ygYcd mKdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=06Q4csTwzZYS7M0h9eX5Ms4zcrlwrbj6PMEJhJzAHZY=; b=rXPY82Lz3utvyFodse10m0xok5Y3V+TOQhLVE/5u1uD5w+jtvJ5CkvbqsCc1ROhJag /0oq4iIp8XQtORzqTEqKHFsrovtN1TKGf4Yfyv10dBVNLcTvlnpSqZhm4Oq9TSi54ct6 3ijccMH3XGtJIJfnbbPgSxTstAGAJF2HM7sEb+RTDvQrUmYBZzQ5NnmVYc3Ip9VWSAKz yvYFR2LUZRpCehuBdb19/89RnDsOmerf6V5MEIijekhJsOK6otrsqMIivDYiD4n4U3qs X50w9994XdNqLSvTVz6HfmiMLPn1sXibyTcHijNjWAreXxDBoQGhSYKJ1XMdWMUB5BvX qT7Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n8si2260407ejs.692.2020.11.25.17.48.05; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730764AbgKZBpG (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:45:06 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:39756 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726009AbgKZBpF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:45:05 -0500 IronPort-SDR: HOkOzRD0U5fZcoABq3d1A407H6ASjGHqdlCWsbG9LHobbDwWsdiQzXxOmqm93L/nxWgQ6JEhXU x6NMuR39Ra+A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9816"; a="152058687" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,370,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="152058687" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2020 17:45:04 -0800 IronPort-SDR: zJhsZISN6zolVB+cjXsvSs3la757HJkgnz0WqsJXQMDiYcEiSB4G7giyU+C8ptErAFYJjMk15Q H6xKhhySqVSA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,370,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="479162524" Received: from xingzhen-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.238.4.68]) ([10.238.4.68]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2020 17:44:57 -0800 Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression To: Chris Wilson , Joonas Lahtinen , Oliver Sang Cc: feng.tang@intel.com, tiejun.li@intel.com, frank.du@intel.com, guobing.chen@intel.com, jiebin.sun@intel.com, Shuhua.Fan@intel.com, Matthew Auld , fan.zhao@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com, shan.kang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@intel.com, Wenhuan.Huang@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, guangli.li@intel.com, gengxin.xie@intel.com, ming.a.chen@intel.com, yu.ma@intel.com, jessica.ji@intel.com, lkp@lists.01.org, wangyang.guo@intel.com, dapeng1.mi@intel.com, LKML References: <20201111155811.GB24657@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <160527763346.5566.3471508802857132043@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20201119072018.GA15197@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <160625087275.29168.7080737993781611765@build.alporthouse.com> From: Xing Zhengjun Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:44:55 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <160625087275.29168.7080737993781611765@build.alporthouse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/25/2020 4:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Oliver Sang (2020-11-19 07:20:18) >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Could you add intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org into reports going >>> forward. >>> >>> Quoting kernel test robot (2020-11-11 17:58:11) >>>> >>>> Greeting, >>>> >>>> FYI, we noticed a -54.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second due to commit: >>> >>> How many runs are there on the bad version to ensure the bisect is >>> repeatable? >> >> test 4 times. >> zxing@inn:/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-Radial_Gradient_Paint-1024x1024-jxrendermark-1.2.4-ucode=0xd6-monitor=da39a3ee/lkp-cfl-d1/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da$ grep -r "operations_per_second" */stats.json >> 0/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4133.487932, >> 1/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4120.421503, >> 2/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4188.414835, >> 3/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4068.549514, > > a w/o revert (drm-tip) > b w/ revert > +mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | ..b | > | ..b.aa | > | ....a.a | > | ....a.a | > | b b ........a | > | b b b b......... a | > | b bb bbb........... | > |b ab bbab.bb.b............ba b a a ab a| > | |__A__| | > | |MA_| | > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > N Min Max Median Avg Stddev > a 120 3621.8761 7356.4442 4606.7895 4607.9132 156.17693 > b 120 2664.0563 6359.9686 4519.5036 4534.4463 95.471121 > > The patch is not expected to have any impact on the machine you are testing on. > -Chris > What's your code base? For my side: 1) sync the code to the head of Linux mainline 2) git reset --hard 59dd13ad31 3) git revert 59dd13ad3107 We compare the test result of commit 59dd13ad3107 (step 2) and 2052847b06f8 (step 3, revert 59dd13ad3107), the regression should related with 59dd13ad3107. Each test case we run 5 times. ========================================================================================= tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/need_x/test/option_a/option_b/cpufreq_governor/ucode/debug-setup: lkp-cfl-d1/phoronix-test-suite/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/true/jxrendermark-1.2.4/Radial Gradient Paint/1024x1024/performance/0xde/regression_test commit: 0dccdba51e852271a3dbc9358375f4c882b863f2 59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da 2052847b06f863a028f7f3bbc62401e043b34301 (revert 59dd13ad3107) 0dccdba51e852271 59dd13ad310793757e34afa489d 2052847b06f863a028f7f3bbc62 ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- %stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev \ | \ | \ 8145 ± 2% -53.1% 3817 ± 3% -1.8% 7995 phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -- Zhengjun Xing