Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932189AbWH0RRl (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:17:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932193AbWH0RRl (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:17:41 -0400 Received: from wohnheim.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.233.138]:42453 "EHLO wohnheim.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932189AbWH0RRl (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:17:41 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:17:28 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Ian Lindsay Cc: fsdevel@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: LogFS Message-ID: <20060827171728.GB3502@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20060824134430.GB17132@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20060827053245.GA15747@gen.formicary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060827053245.GA15747@gen.formicary.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 21 On Sun, 27 August 2006 01:32:45 -0400, Ian Lindsay wrote: > > +/* FIXME: This should really be somewhere in the 64bit area. */ > +#define LOGFS_LINK_MAX (2^30) > > Interesting choice of constant. Yes. I didn't spend a long time thinking about whether it should be 2^31 or 2^31-1 or 2^31-2. It will be a while before it becomes an issue in real life anyway. :) J?rn -- It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you place the blame. -- unknown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/