Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:01:54 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To:     bongsu.jeon2@gmail.com
Cc:     k.opasiak@samsung.com, linux-nfc@lists.01.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: use signed integer for
 parsing GPIO numbers
Message-ID: <20201126170154.GA4978@kozik-lap>
References: <1606404819-30647-1-git-send-email-bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1606404819-30647-1-git-send-email-bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:33:37AM +0900, bongsu.jeon2@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> 
> GPIOs - as returned by of_get_named_gpio() and used by the gpiolib - are
> signed integers, where negative number indicates error.  The return
> value of of_get_named_gpio() should not be assigned to an unsigned int
> because in case of !CONFIG_GPIOLIB such number would be a valid GPIO.
> 
> Fixes: c04c674fadeb ("nfc: s3fwrn5: Add driver for Samsung S3FWRN5 NFC Chip")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Why do you send my patch?

Best regards,
Krzysztof