Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1071504pxu; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:56:03 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b0c5:: with SMTP id bk5mr5954890ejb.217.1606456322831; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:52:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEXxyzUPQnWVCOxh/zVhYBmRVs95T88wiqZyaXtO5n6WpTt4VvmbDpjTFBS/ZP1is6RSBb X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b0c5:: with SMTP id bk5mr5954850ejb.217.1606456321897; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:52:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606456321; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IOqwTBGgcV5iFFsx1/WCZBG7CytD74eBwFw5XlWAMGxwRB/abZlfUHTvQ/rYw26pNZ DPi5VjUnz+9pR3HhYQE5DCvzCK1ANIubt/2uS4rPO6cFXU3Ie0ZsqWbV5ikTCQnRTcL7 jUOe/4CRcjOvxynJCU52SOaaTNDodvjFUa+FXqsek+iZr0b+yVq1BaYO33nRBzeUyiyC /hD8gomEmMPQdyQD0PeSECP4Spvj2Wy9ByS0RJA5lBdA4Tg8aoKVY6guiJ7suTqYiAYi E/TeAQ6+KITrwhvjyVVh1zpicO0/ytnlJoO+IpwkzoeRKZny3ue/s3ekYlSNcGfuTG5Z 5rtw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:mime-version; bh=zVIjctaGAP4reSBvX5ymd3wcQmROOmAEocs+gWj820I=; b=cWnGzO+b0EL/codL0DYTZlhchs+y8JN7sxvQgP8ZNwQdzg9JyjiOA+WgchNEnoy1Pw vjyJRjxpTXg1j84iv7SGe/ThKoVw5gSGdRgikE8p4bTSSZIFmXUKQf66mfFnWW+xVA5U 0lN23Rm7102lZWE3uEwrP8RDri1PXnOMVT/pQ+Zm3O3hitKqGDWoJ5f101LE2jwyZQZm alKKYsO8gntBZjfugbyIHccVkEu8vUftoguIqoxIKD6uLTCLtxmVfhFnOJbf16JOdmrN sa8YouHNMPv5hp9Qn1p4KMZQZT4qA3BBssYvaA2WfVa6HDwMwS9BUVLQc4TZ73P/N2qI 9DJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=teo-en-ming.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e16si4165724ejd.39.2020.11.26.21.51.37; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:52:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=teo-en-ming.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732069AbgKZJaN (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:30:13 -0500 Received: from ec2-3-21-30-127.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([3.21.30.127]:37394 "EHLO www.teo-en-ming.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731885AbgKZJaN (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:30:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by www.teo-en-ming.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DF054448EE0; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:30:11 +0800 (+08) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:30:11 +0800 From: Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: ceo@teo-en-ming-corp.com Subject: Roundcube Webmail: Server Error: Failed to send fetch command Message-ID: <5b93da4f118ec3e987e83ae41a42fa06@teo-en-ming.com> X-Sender: ceo@teo-en-ming.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Roundcube Webmail: Server Error: Failed to send fetch command Good day from Singapore, This is a personal experience. I use Roundcube webmail, which comes out of the box with CentOS/Control Web Panel (CWP) web hosting control panel. After my Inbox reaches almost 200,000 email messages, I frequently encounter the following error: "Server Error: Failed to send fetch command" My Inbox fails to list messages even after multiple repeated attempts to reload. Using Microsoft Outlook to delete all the email messages in Inbox and then emptying the Trash/Deleted Items does not work. After *briefly* searching the internet, I found the solution. The solution can be found in the following article. Article: Standard Webmail (Round Cube) slow performance mitigation Link: https://community.plus.net/t5/Email/Standard-Webmail-Round-Cube-slow-performance-mitigation/td-p/1661899 The solution is quoted as follows: [QUOTE=Townman] The SUs have had this under constant review with Plusnet. After many months of looking at the obvious likely causes, it now looks as though a performance issue within the Round Cube Webmail client has been identified as being a significant contributor to the end user experience of slow loading email lists. Though other issues have been found and addressed, this one remains under investigation. There is however a simple end user mitigation for the issue, which tests have shown makes a SIGNIFICANT performance difference. The issue appears to be related to the mail list display sort sequence. If a user has EVER changed the sort list from the default setting (none) - which lists newest email first - to something different … and then switches back to most recent item first using the column sort toggles, this DOES NOT result in the same configuration as per before changing the sort sequence. There remains an explicit sort setting which gives rise to the performance issue. Not exactly an obvious expectation. To set the sort sequence back to the default setting requires EXPLICT user action... 1. Log into webmail 2. On the inbox list screen select LIST OPTIONS which is the little grid icon on the left of the column title bar 3. Set sorting column to NONE 4. Click save 5. See the mailbox list display nearly instantly Work continues to identify the cause of the delay in retrieving a sorted list. Squirrel Mail (Basic webmail) does not suffer this issue, so might be more pragmatic if you have a large mailbox which you wish to view in a sequence other than by date, most recent first. [/QUOTE] Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming is very happy to have solved this problem/issue with Roundcube webmail, because I will be able to use Roundcube webmail anywhere in the world. Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming, 42 years old as of 26 November 2020 Thursday, is a TARGETED INDIVIDUAL (TI) living in Singapore. -- -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html ******************************************************************************************** Singaporean Targeted Individual Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 and refugee seeking attempts at the United Nations Refugee Agency Bangkok (21 Mar 2017), in Taiwan (5 Aug 2019) and Australia (25 Dec 2019 to 9 Jan 2020): [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming -----END EMAIL SIGNATURE-----