Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:32:40 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next 20201126 - build error on arm allmodconfig
Message-ID: <20201126143239.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <24105.1606397102@turing-police>
 <20201126141429.GL1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <28070.1606400573@turing-police>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <28070.1606400573@turing-police>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:22:53AM -0500, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:14:29 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin said:
> 
> > The real answer is for asm/kasan.h to include linux/linkage.h
> 
> Looking deeper, there's  7 different arch/../asm/kasan.h - are we better off
> patching all 7, or having include/linux/kasan.h include it just before
> the include of asm/kasan.h?

I wouldn't like to say definitively - it depends on what the policy
now is. However, linux/linage.h is way cheaper than linux/pgtable.h
so it probably makes sense for linux/kasan.h to include it given the
number of asm/kasan.h headers needing it.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!