Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1157319pxu; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:44:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqTrpjZW1UYlMy6o9/Pnxrs/vi31AlcKc67tjA07/rSbCALTDImJT26jMfabxhzpsCHmsR X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c2d6:: with SMTP id m22mr6443975edp.368.1606466666877; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:44:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606466666; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S8F7BFh846HEGkWcaozeM2HCCUyIE/u27YM6bRYufUWeVkaLsohfG2Mr27jdrJ5Ewd QZJDRM5LPEOZzHsQWnyWwHdeiUZ6uBpjjFOEePXPDLGG3wKUJaZeHY1AECAxmv0YDDe7 7lRT+ry4Q8uL5issh1phtyj1JkpY+aMUR6GBGpBOobj6Xgo71AmTs9g8LCNLdPbpKJ/X omR55vD/MAH9ZjeqVqyQjmM5igP2sy6VDmcnrgJ/YJZaKkDm4mUqzIBdTc8ot7ElN9jc bbqBP+iIck3dqAG1Jfy1XKlqj7fIvk8F103VHL8miTPC9IHlrpyWe33YiAG+l0E9vDUr qwyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=wtAqiIL4OGNOjCOWpJIS67EUO5pm7/BCFlTCx9jyrY0=; b=yuwmwzVVJAKDpS5yGbwfeloEZQW2x0vYlOIFDmhJHbKDdemOnIIf+L8OTz7VZHCHOZ YvVQrzk4kI6AQRAGMC5wdO5q5TV/CdvPGOUENA61FwJp529NWduubguXLZvdE8QrhRCt f96kOHpLwwOqWG5sJWmMhhOJ0OiXbmiD3Hh8yusoxEY5l1z4sMGPyPgXLaS3MWpZJ0rg FEKMZy0BuSybn4B8MsAf9D1c5+bWPftgDXXyNO5Lgcbm9VlBLPdfn7xSPPEt4ZoSOtYB QExRQlTS7hD7a/TrT6l6EBQ9CPdNi6iwXX9u8UTVrtKgyyL1QrWlqSGHTZHT3b4MjgpM xCWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Cny5LHKn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v9si4642776edb.48.2020.11.27.00.44.04; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:44:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Cny5LHKn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391601AbgKZVG4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:06:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42832 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391385AbgKZVGw (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:06:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com (mail-pl1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 400CBC0613D4 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:06:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id bj5so1667465plb.4 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:06:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wtAqiIL4OGNOjCOWpJIS67EUO5pm7/BCFlTCx9jyrY0=; b=Cny5LHKnxJRw0cPNWlSxQxJLAOqavXYkvssYv+komoercg8UQCRqLL1Dt7dN7w10mi /jK2HtPu8TjYHOvz6LNUomKVqNs56Aeu6E/keXOpMJPmGO4hnrVRc8Th++2ZHOWpI/9z KRcnuSvQkpZvQ1rZsaJjNGubmkPscveRVANqlUSvnzOU/y8VNfcRsxznJk2dQbZXLOLI OlLlLzprXxRgjI65ETsbLde3wmKcelqXo7ApjN07j5dgdWrUh8rupWQZ2+G8Q87vrCVl slY8OqOhgTS/ro3JbICqr1YtfZjJC3lgBJGgTLU4G0Ku3Vq5P79Hhpaqg8TID0lxIqnm p+Lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wtAqiIL4OGNOjCOWpJIS67EUO5pm7/BCFlTCx9jyrY0=; b=BX4Jh3J7BKlgqQFhv6LO4s6DFuhF2EdsH85Jsudf49NUoZq188AGKdcA70R8AE3bXW 5ZHvLeE+LXVUxynQLS6JuYUWw38BSzO1ELgrpNbeuxh1vKT3d7Aq1fdj2Usk1kYlioF4 hZ5Yg444w7lg5UsiYcYPoMQqNb9KfVi+fqN1ORSo1bXlydi+J5xICe1iJY4FK/C7NUlQ TholibtnfpmkUP503dEvJrKwb2ENatoIZAd1OhgV9OeRAAa5OYc7+WPtlivjJG966jJK GTFS8dcbb6nqHUTbyrQ+awznuJrlEnR6xnsDFagFyMwIrOyVi0Okv0/S4sKcsLRenmfP hQ7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gr+EE7jeMSjVpBUNsQ3oZH+uZmgFX8CuKnEEmvwRCY97zj22j x0ATannHMEbK5OfnMeUHdaoIhQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e9cc:b029:da:1d7a:f5fa with SMTP id 12-20020a170902e9ccb02900da1d7af5famr4151197plk.38.1606424811844; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps15.cg.shawcable.net (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c203sm5612676pfc.10.2020.11.26.13.06.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:06:51 -0800 (PST) From: Mathieu Poirier To: ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnaud.pouliquen@st.com Subject: [PATCH v3 08/15] remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach() Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:06:35 -0700 Message-Id: <20201126210642.897302-9-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20201126210642.897302-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> References: <20201126210642.897302-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Introduce function __rproc_detach() to perform the same kind of operation as rproc_stop(), but instead of switching off the remote processor using rproc->ops->stop(), it uses rproc->ops->detach(). That way it is possible for the core to release the resources associated with a remote processor while the latter is kept operating. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier Reviewed-by: Peng Fan --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 539667948bc8..928b3f975798 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1664,6 +1664,37 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed) return 0; } +/* + * __rproc_detach(): Does the opposite of rproc_attach() + */ +static int __maybe_unused __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; + int ret; + + /* No need to continue if a detach() operation has not been provided */ + if (!rproc->ops->detach) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Stop any subdevices for the remote processor */ + rproc_stop_subdevices(rproc, false); + + /* Tell the remote processor the core isn't available anymore */ + ret = rproc->ops->detach(rproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "can't detach from rproc: %d\n", ret); + rproc_start_subdevices(rproc); + return ret; + } + + rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc); + + rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED; + + dev_info(dev, "detached remote processor %s\n", rproc->name); + + return 0; +} /** * rproc_trigger_recovery() - recover a remoteproc -- 2.25.1