Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1157646pxu; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:45:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSA0ypa9WdMHiwJCUS3ahpatRs1Jt3dmkDG65utwEggxGdYhw8kMAmPoCRHevyMhN9z3jK X-Received: by 2002:aa7:ce8c:: with SMTP id y12mr6518130edv.185.1606466701131; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:45:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606466701; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=db3tTyCb3bVneThWrjLkRgaZUnlLngZ4figumYW62lUPGt9777Iq/FVWYiZFITqUsS amK6VKJeaRwVddleymW8D3CMhKhwhxNJLDi/GLZy3rZ1mhzIKb1qe+vneztllzrOybSg 18VNABeoCqa+6gPJeuEiryi3zpdcWMFHxP66mpuDWH35qyRlE7DETnkhCur3ynaTOeQF uK4/4hg6Y35Gna6ivjbgMjedxY83afNnOwlTE05tqSptxBCBcfi6xIa7KgTyILOifA7J kbcEgk27E+PBmwhjGLTRBU/PLyaT8SsDp7bi6EVol9maOolbdDAVAJlO49lDQaNd1+Ol UhJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:message-id:date:to:cc:from:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=2BkzfVEiaO6GKN97duFMFmYy4BHlKZ4kTqHBy1Xe0Zk=; b=id55D6AO5iu/Gad7AvB+2wIRgAF/hisUyqiHJMkz3+vlFr8an4woCUmTQkk11jVZTm oSJ/JsXayZWm+u/ANYFBiG808CTxACWSoAH8jWneBpYoK63Y5jZi4BQOZ+tV5+yuYrNN uPwlSRiccAVSHVZKD8MDQVAn9FDM3SDgSYFDzW9eTYOJR7mjaGk1Xwsyjc8gEowhdvRM kX7ZUtWcwrdjc3GVvwCVJcnKKDfo43uUU84IQkAV7XA/Uf4DwokzWA2F9cMBShF7vShn xpXGZjasO0FCF/yxzypA67ugfN8F6YbuLQdhH+ILh4WYxoBYKqhDKsAK2IiYy7tbaAa/ x/LQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u4si4666796ejr.287.2020.11.27.00.44.38; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:45:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388049AbgKZVe0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:34:26 -0500 Received: from mail.fireflyinternet.com ([77.68.26.236]:60210 "EHLO fireflyinternet.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726178AbgKZVe0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:34:26 -0500 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=78.156.65.138; Received: from localhost (unverified [78.156.65.138]) by fireflyinternet.com (Firefly Internet (M1)) with ESMTP (TLS) id 23122683-1500050 for multiple; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:34:08 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: References: <20201111155811.GB24657@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <160527763346.5566.3471508802857132043@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20201119072018.GA15197@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <160625087275.29168.7080737993781611765@build.alporthouse.com> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression From: Chris Wilson Cc: feng.tang@intel.com, tiejun.li@intel.com, guangli.li@intel.com, frank.du@intel.com, guobing.chen@intel.com, jiebin.sun@intel.com, Shuhua.Fan@intel.com, Matthew Auld , fan.zhao@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com, shan.kang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@intel.com, Wenhuan.Huang@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, lkp@lists.01.org, ming.a.chen@intel.com, yu.ma@intel.com, jessica.ji@intel.com, dapeng1.mi@intel.com, wangyang.guo@intel.com, LKML , gengxin.xie@intel.com To: Joonas Lahtinen , Oliver Sang , Xing Zhengjun Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:34:07 +0000 Message-ID: <160642644736.15379.9850669928715684163@build.alporthouse.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Xing Zhengjun (2020-11-26 01:44:55) > > > On 11/25/2020 4:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Oliver Sang (2020-11-19 07:20:18) > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Could you add intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org into reports going > >>> forward. > >>> > >>> Quoting kernel test robot (2020-11-11 17:58:11) > >>>> > >>>> Greeting, > >>>> > >>>> FYI, we noticed a -54.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second due to commit: > >>> > >>> How many runs are there on the bad version to ensure the bisect is > >>> repeatable? > >> > >> test 4 times. > >> zxing@inn:/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-Radial_Gradient_Paint-1024x1024-jxrendermark-1.2.4-ucode=0xd6-monitor=da39a3ee/lkp-cfl-d1/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da$ grep -r "operations_per_second" */stats.json > >> 0/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4133.487932, > >> 1/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4120.421503, > >> 2/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4188.414835, > >> 3/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4068.549514, > > > > a w/o revert (drm-tip) > > b w/ revert > > +mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > | ..b | > > | ..b.aa | > > | ....a.a | > > | ....a.a | > > | b b ........a | > > | b b b b......... a | > > | b bb bbb........... | > > |b ab bbab.bb.b............ba b a a ab a| > > | |__A__| | > > | |MA_| | > > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > N Min Max Median Avg Stddev > > a 120 3621.8761 7356.4442 4606.7895 4607.9132 156.17693 > > b 120 2664.0563 6359.9686 4519.5036 4534.4463 95.471121 > > > > The patch is not expected to have any impact on the machine you are testing on. > > -Chris > > > > What's your code base? > For my side: > 1) sync the code to the head of Linux mainline > 2) git reset --hard 59dd13ad31 > 3) git revert 59dd13ad3107 > We compare the test result of commit 59dd13ad3107 (step 2) and > 2052847b06f8 (step 3, revert 59dd13ad3107), the regression should > related with 59dd13ad3107. Each test case we run 5 times. a 59dd13ad31 b revert +mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | a | | aa | | .b....ba | | .b....baa b | | .........b . b b | | a b.......... ..bb b b | | b a b.............b.a b b | |a a b. .aaa..b.............b..b....ab b a .| | |__A__| | | |___A_____| | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ N Min Max Median Avg Stddev a 120 3658.3435 6363.7812 4527.4406 4536.612 86.095459 b 120 3928.9643 6375.829 4576.0482 4585.4224 157.284