Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932354AbWH1CLE (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:11:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932349AbWH1CLE (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:11:04 -0400 Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:29316 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932347AbWH1CLB (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:11:01 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:10:57 -0400 From: Josef Sipek To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: Al Boldi , Eric Van Hensbergen , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] VFS: FS CoW using redirection Message-ID: <20060828021057.GA30334@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> References: <200607082041.54489.a1426z@gawab.com> <20060823172402.GC15851@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20060823180552.GC28873@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> <200608262205.21397.a1426z@gawab.com> <20060827171510.GA3502@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060827171510.GA3502@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1371 Lines: 30 On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:15:10PM +0200, J?rn Engel wrote: > On Sat, 26 August 2006 22:05:21 +0300, Al Boldi wrote: ... > > > Or you can give Unionfs a try: http://www.unionfs.org > > > > UnionFS is great, but it incurs additional overhead, as it lives below the > > real VFS. What could be really great, is to move some basic functionality > > abstractions from UnionFS into VFS proper. > > If you want to make this vision happen, one of the missing pieces is a > method for copyup, an in-kernel copying routine. Unionfs needs is > just the same as Jan's patches do and in the past Linus didn't like my > approach of using sendfile for it. You could take a stab at the > splice code and see how that can be used for copyup. The thing with union mounts/unionfs is that some of the functionality makes sense to have in a file system while other parts make sense to have in the VFS - the way I see it, namespace related bits should be in VFS while persistent state should be done on the file system level. Josef "Jeff" Sipek. -- If I have trouble installing Linux, something is wrong. Very wrong. - Linus Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/