Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <72df55ca-20f3-c3ee-861b-c50c1a55495e@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <72df55ca-20f3-c3ee-861b-c50c1a55495e@canonical.com>
From:   Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:20:49 -0300
Message-ID: <CAHD1Q_yTqgcp83eMFtWFzTwAaUVvRAui+mXdwhh_TiukA+bz=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: About ftrace+pstore+ramoops
To:     anton@enomsg.org, joel@joelfernandes.org
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, ccross@android.com,
        tony.luck@intel.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Just a heads-up on top of my own email: as soon as I sent the email, I
had an idea. I was trying with ramoops.ftrace_size=X, so I removed
this parameter and it worked. As expected, it's a small buffer so
collected mostly the ramoops own functions, but worked in the end -
I'll debug the reason it failed with ftrace_size.

Apologies for the inconvenience!
Cheers,


Guilherme