Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201125120134.GA1642471@jade> <CAK8P3a2CDp0KwCZjffA78fXUqOfAkvUb8Q=R64830fvvn_WG2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2CDp0KwCZjffA78fXUqOfAkvUb8Q=R64830fvvn_WG2w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:14:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHUa44Fnj4zQ_3O+kdzVopVAggUOdb34KGnA8+r=Rp-4+etWbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] OP-TEE driver for v5.11
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc:     arm-soc <arm@kernel.org>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
        Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:00 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:01 PM Jens Wiklander
> <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello arm-soc maintainers,
> >
> > Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with
> > ARMv7 based single CPU systems.
>
> Can you rebase that branch onto -rc1? I had started the arm/drivers
> branch early on top of that, so I'd prefer to avoid a backmerged.
>
> For the commit itself, shouldn't that be marked as a bugfix and get
> merged into v5.10 instead? If it should, you don't have to rebase
> since the arm/fixes branch is already ahead.

Yes it is a bit of a bugfix, so if you don't mind taking it as that
I'm sure that Rui would be happy to get it in this release.

>
> Also, it would be nice to Cc linux-arm-kernel on the pull request
> in addition to linux-kernel.

I'll keep that in mind the next time. Thanks for the feedback.

Cheers,
Jens