Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1930650pxu; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:42:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8UAthUs1ajITZH4d2vPeNQhFFCTME1cvgSDnjlhH2NZ8nQFlBPkSyFWJ2gf3zjGA1GSaW X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1a2b:: with SMTP id be11mr12121479edb.353.1606538570935; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:42:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606538570; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yRNu5q2F24Ab+T67tE94oSmEv11HPxBysD21SceKYYfKTf8VUK1iGtweRRRCVr0WrE ynfxeUW87NyRD57ObaUF4mNPtrBPRk2XivUIwu/uXzFGK6zJysxnKIu2JgGko/Z/kVCe MN53Q9ZMaHURvK83aL6Njj53a3o9AzPkBywyGyeie0ap16kjWPOuKK5Gq166VNEfs8h9 glhe0a3V9KRhK8BKUpilCr9k8cCK4SAlnhEzIj5y/QGyx2nAbs3s8DUZkvZdnmeuO4tY lwsT6NsLeIjYhg+q+xIoehssz2I11go1JOjbCOmUfMjJpgJueu5HCXAvxX5rpbjBs3Jm 2Prw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=hvD8YJFaBMmHLoSTZJa7kEYMSN1RuQlrpybNMRUx/UE=; b=MJco95Hnin8Jx4/NVeZ9uFWd2Ajo9ayAgQ0noBWLvv2WXCsihYDwsuzr7/pfFHFSkt nHQqFYF5ScLSqf6hV6KY1xG8qElHM9gdMqZpoVoGBBfiAMCOU3sLIGCLbAQgDYoV6twn sDHOvqbjBbxv+Rw96l+uaorTXLAB1zjLvkekkdv7n+0FhnnVQ2iccX8ek02wjIaSAsKG 9awyxAhFLONvXCp3nCxY4FZ/DhHjHojWrx0HfJQQZY6e+pSnAas5cLtyCYcHAvF6DsjT 6Asx2PE4W0T+lf5EHfD2sS3P5VogIigB7VsY/cONojoVE/bM0+dsdNLiWT4CCdrAShcd M6Fg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=JAALZCsu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 65si1428424edc.425.2020.11.27.20.42.11; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:42:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=JAALZCsu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732505AbgK1E3d (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 23:29:33 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54698 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731107AbgK1E0P (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2020 23:26:15 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE87822210; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 04:02:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1606536139; bh=cEMGKa+zaxvHsRTKQlwMDDceDlj0bM6QUnQtUx0U94c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JAALZCsu2JDfiEM8zsNRQXwSeYlLs10hrPu3LQgqgHaCQf7jTRXkxTF+UxLNcJQU9 fd83a8RvMdiCYjGXuARb2VEaYNdZKJrNzETQjq7U/saO8xsyVSdhWOHW38Cx+8Qmo8 E+ayM46ekK+b369uO9g7eeBP8IkN7SilD8RrPd1I= Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 20:02:15 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Alex Shi Cc: Johannes Weiner , Shakeel Butt , Roman Gushchin , Lorenzo Stoakes , Stephen Rothwell , Alexander Duyck , Yafang Shao , Wei Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: bail out early when !memcg in mem_cgroup_lruvec Message-Id: <20201127200215.dc96a839cdd816361e7093e6@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1606446515-36069-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1606446515-36069-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:08:35 +0800 Alex Shi wrote: > Sometime, we use NULL memcg in mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat) > so we could get out early in the situation to avoid useless checking. > > Also warning if both parameter are NULL. Why do you think a warning is needed here? > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > @@ -613,14 +613,13 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_lruvec(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, > struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz; > struct lruvec *lruvec; > > - if (mem_cgroup_disabled()) { > + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!memcg && !pgdat); > + > + if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !memcg) { > lruvec = &pgdat->__lruvec; > goto out; > } > > - if (!memcg) > - memcg = root_mem_cgroup; > - This change isn't obviously equivalent, is it? > mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, pgdat->node_id); > lruvec = &mz->lruvec; > out: And the resulting code is awkward: if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !memcg) { lruvec = &pgdat->__lruvec; goto out; } mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, pgdat->node_id); lruvec = &mz->lruvec; out: could be if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !memcg) { lruvec = &pgdat->__lruvec; } else { mem_cgroup_per_node mz; mz = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, pgdat->node_id); lruvec = &mz->lruvec; }