Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751173AbWH1QQJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:16:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751154AbWH1QQJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:16:09 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:34778 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751173AbWH1QQH (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:16:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates From: Arjan van de Ven To: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: Paul E McKenney , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060828160845.GB3325@in.ibm.com> References: <20060828160845.GB3325@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:15:48 +0200 Message-Id: <1156781748.3034.212.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 22 On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 21:38 +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote: > This patchset consists of various merge candidates that would > do well to have some testing in -mm. This patchset breaks > out RCU implementation from its APIs to allow multiple > implementations, Hi, can you explain why we would want multiple RCU implementations? Isn't one going to be plenty already? Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/