Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3383056pxu; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:38:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzK0TsREZpb4GhMqKzK/3NzC9r6L59ySqduN3FgSu2JaO1U04LqJzENZKxYbu4y8Se2IxyW X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:d08:: with SMTP id eb8mr21372103edb.271.1606729113917; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:38:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606729113; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gctQ3dGO9B4T7Wz8Dl9vd7owhvZ0RR5bL3zS6ySQxzih4SFu7qWr20OvUS7eZ487zH zVcOWHldeIbGev/2AI8lEKfFiZYNpcjQDA2AZ5tmt3ZR2qr0OyFyfKB/z9FO+I1WInEM xB6vbWYsTAzggiBYeG7o1FYPq1QxDlBfX2B/QHNhtZvcOIb6CXJzVd30VyoXrbagEwWl qtAzJP2g7DQ1cDtHf9M9Aa/XscUaW7dUSBhwYNemtgtH7BfNor/iJrQRztjzDFZBjz93 QE++sapgaiJ9/frgxBcsl0vctBDTiToFvCwCMQVHXG8H1Lk9uNWvGfRq0+QYt83hvHte BV9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=H7wZtjSzGIaF/U+jd9vQGVbaZpJMrOBssW+kZUbY0C4=; b=hmCu78sGrz+VFHdmrkjWkC1zLYEoVFTglEk2lhofLGC4Bg+mO9SBnuOyw4Wl8Ws/Ca SkcId9m87kfBY9M9cRP9WHHwETtHGYa7w8OSFddp3ktgQ8P7UGOGyVX54Bo44CMMC4LX O1PhIzX0PbwDnjvNnm8L1KEvrE3S63H3upJVBrb+2wBoiLG0GtPJuuB9yssRVS88B6dP 7Sm48BBguSfc5mqpAjBVsLTuhbSGuOAFmBg+nhoklVUXNmkd47+24GB4Mlz0ehv1e9yd 1lMLoOFCE0A6zSdofGlcr3tPkt3Wegz/RaBgXM5W1565ZQNHmB6553C+9dRxnksWKU7x 173g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=U1kXFQSv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z41si11133355ede.250.2020.11.30.01.38.10; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:38:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=U1kXFQSv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728440AbgK3Jeq (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 30 Nov 2020 04:34:46 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:58980 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726337AbgK3Jep (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2020 04:34:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606728798; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H7wZtjSzGIaF/U+jd9vQGVbaZpJMrOBssW+kZUbY0C4=; b=U1kXFQSvw9nxNBHLfGfC833Hqydtj/8pspR3J8iUQULr7kYFBVspkVt6uQwsq6f+mLuBGn JidBbl6QU+HsUG9HZHrS+mktwxBsQNR1zCKr3wkUN7wGGRorD/MHVMQuW1DOJWO9dJyxNM Qp1mOAHrt49lpAl0+2cqyREQAbBJQkg= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-364-gjWxiQtiPb-kvUzH-C-gsA-1; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 04:33:14 -0500 X-MC-Unique: gjWxiQtiPb-kvUzH-C-gsA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 91so8070297wrk.17 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:33:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=H7wZtjSzGIaF/U+jd9vQGVbaZpJMrOBssW+kZUbY0C4=; b=mDInxWp+/sRihf9CIeh/+3DSVeNXnM6kw4tTW6CZ57cwxpIPrXhx3X78i338ngqDRp wwlcELfMD3AY3aEDQuztCz7wwUy59gz+R8C8jnaaHHdii6IWiHxhM3DaSFByheDd4/HC ItUnGjku4+1YCOmvnO2QdL+drQsrfRp58HsRxXNR8sC+2KWNbYbKLKpPogwR37dRhamd o9DEb8RalZjg8jAL4flPrAamiOaeFTxe9Xt4Lw3OWJf8Ey4APPSi7wmdg26sK8JS+ydh f5BvpoiBvcQ5qnsubj6i7nAnIlcuHI3ffQe+TDNjlU8K9sBVv279V4c0Z/Cy8lOn6aXM A7ZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kZEWkh3oexom2TvIVXRxczoe6ecyQANhhpJGstmEyk/C8NOD0 swhwO7DDY7G41lpDAzmMKD4vwQMSbxMseYCvplyW+68r25pmi+qa6y3G9UmVf5IA8VRhOPJDeH4 EJXt2h7iww2+EUTzoKhxwV+yh X-Received: by 2002:adf:8143:: with SMTP id 61mr26745546wrm.318.1606728793268; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:33:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:adf:8143:: with SMTP id 61mr26745520wrm.318.1606728793106; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-79-176-44-197.red.bezeqint.net. [79.176.44.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x9sm19438455wru.55.2020.11.30.01.33.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Nov 2020 01:33:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 04:33:09 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Eli Cohen Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lulu@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Use random MAC for the vdpa net instance Message-ID: <20201130043050-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20201129064351.63618-1-elic@nvidia.com> <20201129150505-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20201130062746.GA99449@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx> <20201130035147-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20201130092759.GB99449@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201130092759.GB99449@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:27:59AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 04:00:51AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 08:27:46AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 03:08:22PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 08:43:51AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > We should not try to use the VF MAC address as that is used by the > > > > > regular (e.g. mlx5_core) NIC implementation. Instead, use a random > > > > > generated MAC address. > > > > > > > > > > Suggested by: Cindy Lu > > > > > Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported mlx5 devices") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen > > > > > > > > I didn't realise it's possible to use VF in two ways > > > > with and without vdpa. > > > > > > Using a VF you can create quite a few resources, e.g. send queues > > > recieve queues, virtio_net queues etc. So you can possibly create > > > several instances of vdpa net devices and nic net devices. > > > > > > > Could you include a bit more description on the failure > > > > mode? > > > > > > Well, using the MAC address of the nic vport is wrong since that is the > > > MAC of the regular NIC implementation of mlx5_core. > > > > Right but ATM it doesn't coexist with vdpa so what's the problem? > > > > This call is wrong: mlx5_query_nic_vport_mac_address() > > > > > Is switching to a random mac for such an unusual > > > > configuration really justified? > > > > > > Since I can't use the NIC's MAC address, I have two options: > > > 1. To get the MAC address as was chosen by the user administering the > > > NIC. This should invoke the set_config callback. Unfortunately this > > > is not implemented yet. > > > > > > 2. Use a random MAC address. This is OK since if (1) is implemented it > > > can always override this random configuration. > > > > > > > It looks like changing a MAC could break some guests, > > > > can it not? > > > > > > > > > > No, it will not. The current version of mlx5 VDPA does not allow regular > > > NIC driver and VDPA to co-exist. I have patches ready that enable that > > > from steering point of view. I will post them here once other patches on > > > which they depend will be merged. > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20201120230339.651609-12-saeedm@nvidia.com/ > > > > Could you be more explicit on the following points: > > - which configuration is broken ATM (as in, two device have identical > > macs? any other issues)? > > The only wrong thing is the call to mlx5_query_nic_vport_mac_address(). > It's not breaking anything yet is wrong. The random MAC address setting > is required for the steering patches. Okay so I'm not sure the Fixes tag at least is appropriate if it's a dependency of a new feature. > > - why won't device MAC change from guest point of view? > > > > It's lack of implementation in qemu as far as I know. Sorry not sure I understand. What's not implemented in QEMU? > > > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 5 +---- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > index 1fa6fcac8299..80d06d958b8b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > @@ -1955,10 +1955,7 @@ void *mlx5_vdpa_add_dev(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev) > > > > > if (err) > > > > > goto err_mtu; > > > > > > > > > > - err = mlx5_query_nic_vport_mac_address(mdev, 0, 0, config->mac); > > > > > - if (err) > > > > > - goto err_mtu; > > > > > - > > > > > + eth_random_addr(config->mac); > > > > > mvdev->vdev.dma_dev = mdev->device; > > > > > err = mlx5_vdpa_alloc_resources(&ndev->mvdev); > > > > > if (err) > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.26.2 > > > > > >