Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <aa1ac4f7ae4aed8af07b61f914eb69a1827e8e4d.camel@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: scheduling while atomic in z3fold
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 17:36:14 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20201130163214.3zdlppkkd7dnnpzp@linutronix.de>
References: <f1c39a0504310a97e42b667fc4d458af4a86d97a.camel@gmx.de>
         <e38055ffe19751ba63f1c9beceae222438bcac59.camel@gmx.de>
         <20201129112922.db53kmtpu76xxukj@spock.localdomain>
         <90c4857c53b657147bfb71a281ece9839b0373c2.camel@gmx.de>
         <20201130132014.mlvxeyiub3fpwyw7@linutronix.de>
         <856b5cc2a3d4eb673743b52956bf1e60dcdf87a1.camel@gmx.de>
         <20201130145229.mhbkrfuvyctniaxi@linutronix.de>
         <05121515e73891ceb9e5caf64b6111fc8ff43fab.camel@gmx.de>
         <20201130160327.ov32m4rapk4h432a@linutronix.de>
         <2658a2a26e53826687cd7b22f424e2d3319423dd.camel@gmx.de>
         <20201130163214.3zdlppkkd7dnnpzp@linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 17:32 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-11-30 17:27:17 [+0100], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > This just passed. It however killed my git-gc task which wasn't done=
.
> > > Let me try tomorrow with your config.
> >
> > FYI, I tried 5.9-rt (after fixing 5.9.11), it exploded in the same way=
,
> > so (as expected) it's not some devel tree oopsie.
>
> v5.9 has the same missing local-lock init due to merged local-lock
> upstream. I don't remember when this get_cpu_ptr() came it.

This was with your test patch applied.

	-Mike