Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: FKjhZb9tWijHWBMln/M8zRWAGbWNZAh9zAjDc7priTsgLezm88/siB4SXHiy+gSMpsQMtZaW55
 38y28s+qSHtA==
IronPort-SDR: Wgc4eitWPb8ak9rBnCRxJRjmebpIANdJt+sJjkBY00GVzV8i1uJR1XAEsze0/PmfGtMltoW4AD
 yemmCWnOj8JQ==
Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:21:43 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        lenb@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, wsa@kernel.org, yong.zhi@intel.com,
        sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com,
        tian.shu.qiu@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org, robert.moore@intel.com,
        erik.kaneda@intel.com, pmladek@suse.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
        kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com, jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
        jorhand@linux.microsoft.com, kitakar@gmail.com,
        heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] property: Return true in
 fwnode_device_is_available for node types that do not implement this
 operation
Message-ID: <20201130172143.GL4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20201130133129.1024662-1-djrscally@gmail.com>
 <20201130133129.1024662-2-djrscally@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201130133129.1024662-2-djrscally@gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:12PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Some types of fwnode_handle do not implement the device_is_available()
> check, such as those created by software_nodes. There isn't really a
> meaningful way to check for the availability of a device that doesn't
> actually exist, so if the check isn't implemented just assume that the
> "device" is present.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> Suggested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v3:
> 
> 	patch introduced
> 
>  drivers/base/property.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> index 4c43d30145c6..a5ca2306796f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> @@ -785,9 +785,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_handle_put);
>  /**
>   * fwnode_device_is_available - check if a device is available for use
>   * @fwnode: Pointer to the fwnode of the device.
> + *
> + * For fwnode node types that don't implement the .device_is_available()
> + * operation, this function returns true.
>   */
>  bool fwnode_device_is_available(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  {
> +	if (!fwnode_has_op(fwnode, device_is_available))
> +		return true;
>  	return fwnode_call_bool_op(fwnode, device_is_available);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_device_is_available);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko