Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp4380748pxu; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 03:37:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxuYBgory5seTqUxlh3zWN75EZPY96njDVTtbi00AEpG2DUSPIEGzvyEl+qDZfSWKOYHYiQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1389:: with SMTP id b9mr2613690edv.178.1606822663445; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:37:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606822663; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bpfexf7Fp1SuCcjS8ucQIuIRDGwFLLkgxanhN0iHqxXSlvrtbhVtoFNiUV3UnpPPT6 geLCivECbWT1LQBMY12olIx2s9E5GNUlWJkYMBKbhyAtO4+BIIj95XxxiYQojEwXK2xC TTYrpOgG2bJJ2LEuJ10DxTkGGRhV0rotbsj7pob+1oidhvwhn/YZ8axO6zPwHqHheQp/ G8b/uJZaOPGsQa1fDHvOtRdq/h8bkZsrxLlRCybwv6Z9zIIfh7R6dwSFg6i7VGvgGrfB 3bpgTGUJt+MjqX6i9tjjSRzhGc4K9ZjCffzz7b1Tiy1FqRNL9nVwbPUVyT/U5qdM2M9Y 1mNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Svz+1xyDUI6OILOu+XfjM4sFd1o5nMwo/UZKflYJ9Nc=; b=BHxy4YMpEaKI2RHG459eovOWv/s7LfwNU5e7uC8rD9qe3jmjeNPrRBvgW2c2Ox1Vuc VWPFlyL7zvFGhJG0WlRaOWKO2+/nPM4tTc+QJyls7cRkR19X9f4W049LxSgwWYBKS0vj bSr5sWBWdPdRf4lp064ozNTDFk4uLoi3P4BlXGPlyHUGSLyawHbuST+h++aLbC9txbIY ytBz9vp3ENbG4VPimP9243Ne86RHRCSx/5T14qfN42j5ryQtz943Y6kPn/QfTyWt0H+J ehCrhGkmMbBoeIDD/vdPInGvvlIZrr/yvhzTIZeRaQ8KINIzMxuzvkGHwo0uyjvuxGuB j/zQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=EzcgZGGM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f19si779718ejq.225.2020.12.01.03.37.17; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:37:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=EzcgZGGM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730559AbgLALdt (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 06:33:49 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:45924 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727378AbgLALdt (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 06:33:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606822341; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Svz+1xyDUI6OILOu+XfjM4sFd1o5nMwo/UZKflYJ9Nc=; b=EzcgZGGMunoGV4Kf+FHydRu6AZK5tidqtZa4Tnx80HY/hGBAxrdGBNbovfKahqtAO41fwT bO5b9q33fIQt94tr1Ab2JB9BjfNYUYFYt497hdONWVIp3yVpftNqkLI7dDOnnw/o7dpRkP zbHRtobYGbe1elL+SssXwmX6o8c4uL8= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-262-7BiDawGgN3i_wPYpMHk2Ng-1; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:32:17 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 7BiDawGgN3i_wPYpMHk2Ng-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id f2so1053755ejx.22 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:32:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=Svz+1xyDUI6OILOu+XfjM4sFd1o5nMwo/UZKflYJ9Nc=; b=m3B5P4mHYVOwn0rfSIKVqya410PtoYuq0wc+tiDvJrX1T4vN+S6VWJtw/hgqpO2Sss umiohFKucffZUzzWtABaMHJts9CzMdQJEKCOeNKgZBDiA+YPSCX7V4Xl0VsTnoI57jFk zIScqr8L5Qe3UNbUhuVtqpY4r7JP8niu2DAW2bL+0T37+6s5eebMRyd3t00MC/SHbs1Q 9UHZV6B++jLPPsqqEC9cL6Ww1RI1A51DwFA2LlpdeXjcJ21pcsJlIKZ7OUdBeFONuLpE u1T2AU/DyufQuX78Fu2IUwEicp96JzrEmYJf1OZt+dR8wZL/50ekSsz2kNZfv3E1aNQ/ 9pUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319HcWrMHQiiD6/p62Rnz6/izsRCVlbcQqh/SxTDBPwx09qvjlh MeIWYx3nq4fEBJbOVITM2sKbDy5awApouapKodPanmyzfRNn0pLmRR7lHwbxdoMdMRpCjdU62Ss 4YUekScUIfXgwVRv+vpql6ELu X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7aca:: with SMTP id k10mr2445569ejo.215.1606822336239; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:32:16 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7aca:: with SMTP id k10mr2445552ejo.215.1606822335923; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:32:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com ([147.161.9.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i21sm676575edt.92.2020.12.01.03.32.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 03:32:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 06:32:11 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Cindy Lu Cc: Eli Cohen , Jason Wang , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Use random MAC for the vdpa net instance Message-ID: <20201201063124-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20201129064351.63618-1-elic@nvidia.com> <20201129150505-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20201130062746.GA99449@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx> <20201130035147-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20201130092759.GB99449@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx> <20201130043050-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20201130103142-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 05:23:18PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:33 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:41:45PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:33 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:27:59AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 04:00:51AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 08:27:46AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 03:08:22PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 08:43:51AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > > > > > We should not try to use the VF MAC address as that is used by the > > > > > > > > > regular (e.g. mlx5_core) NIC implementation. Instead, use a random > > > > > > > > > generated MAC address. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested by: Cindy Lu > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported mlx5 devices") > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't realise it's possible to use VF in two ways > > > > > > > > with and without vdpa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using a VF you can create quite a few resources, e.g. send queues > > > > > > > recieve queues, virtio_net queues etc. So you can possibly create > > > > > > > several instances of vdpa net devices and nic net devices. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you include a bit more description on the failure > > > > > > > > mode? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, using the MAC address of the nic vport is wrong since that is the > > > > > > > MAC of the regular NIC implementation of mlx5_core. > > > > > > > > > > > > Right but ATM it doesn't coexist with vdpa so what's the problem? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This call is wrong: mlx5_query_nic_vport_mac_address() > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is switching to a random mac for such an unusual > > > > > > > > configuration really justified? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since I can't use the NIC's MAC address, I have two options: > > > > > > > 1. To get the MAC address as was chosen by the user administering the > > > > > > > NIC. This should invoke the set_config callback. Unfortunately this > > > > > > > is not implemented yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Use a random MAC address. This is OK since if (1) is implemented it > > > > > > > can always override this random configuration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks like changing a MAC could break some guests, > > > > > > > > can it not? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it will not. The current version of mlx5 VDPA does not allow regular > > > > > > > NIC driver and VDPA to co-exist. I have patches ready that enable that > > > > > > > from steering point of view. I will post them here once other patches on > > > > > > > which they depend will be merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20201120230339.651609-12-saeedm@nvidia.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you be more explicit on the following points: > > > > > > - which configuration is broken ATM (as in, two device have identical > > > > > > macs? any other issues)? > > > > > > > > > > The only wrong thing is the call to mlx5_query_nic_vport_mac_address(). > > > > > It's not breaking anything yet is wrong. The random MAC address setting > > > > > is required for the steering patches. > > > > > > > > Okay so I'm not sure the Fixes tag at least is appropriate if it's a > > > > dependency of a new feature. > > > > > > > > > > - why won't device MAC change from guest point of view? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's lack of implementation in qemu as far as I know. > > > > > > > > Sorry not sure I understand. What's not implemented in QEMU? > > > > > > > HI Michael, there are some bug in qemu to set_config, this will fix in future, > > > But this patch is still needed, because without this patch the mlx > > > driver will give an 0 mac address to qemu > > > and qemu will overwrite the default mac address. This will cause traffic down. > > > > Hmm the patch description says VF mac address, not 0 address. Confused. > > If there's no mac we can clear VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC and have guest > > use a random value ... > > > hi Michael, > I have tried as your suggestion, seems even remove the > VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC the qemu will still call get_cinfig and overwrite the > default address in VM, > this process is like > vdpa _init -->qemu call get_config ->mlx driver will give an mac > address with all 0--> > qemu will not check this mac address and use it --> overwrite the mac > address in qemu Right but guest will ignore it then, right? > So for my understanding there are several method to fix this problem > > 1, qemu check the mac address, if the mac address is all 0, qemu will > ignore it and set the random mac address to mlx driver. > 2. mlx driver checks the mac address and if this mac is 0, return fail > to qemu, but this need to change the UAPI. > 3. mlx driver it shelf should get an correct mac address while it init. > 4. add check in qemu get_config function , if there is not F_MAC Then > ignore the mac address from mlx driver > > not sure which method is more suitable ? > > Thanks > Cindy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 5 +---- > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > > > > > index 1fa6fcac8299..80d06d958b8b 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -1955,10 +1955,7 @@ void *mlx5_vdpa_add_dev(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev) > > > > > > > > > if (err) > > > > > > > > > goto err_mtu; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - err = mlx5_query_nic_vport_mac_address(mdev, 0, 0, config->mac); > > > > > > > > > - if (err) > > > > > > > > > - goto err_mtu; > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > + eth_random_addr(config->mac); > > > > > > > > > mvdev->vdev.dma_dev = mdev->device; > > > > > > > > > err = mlx5_vdpa_alloc_resources(&ndev->mvdev); > > > > > > > > > if (err) > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > 2.26.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >