Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp95566pxu; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 06:58:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQJieQJuiPQAIwdj3iSsj93wkWCQvjUUsUtuMlx617XFhWUlmHmoe9fyYJSDfI9CKUTDOS X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1352:: with SMTP id y18mr3392683edw.378.1606834733818; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:58:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606834733; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kOcVDT/A1Dmo43pjXIiPjY+r/HJ7aCxccooU2Tdeys3qAemw8yb2vTs7q3uXhwCzP2 BHm/Rx0s4QAuEW2wedSxjYz4bq9wkeJ5lTmrxMvvRsJLQ79+eHGQ0FNAP9hzBcUZrM1O cXDpUp9lY2DV1ewSBAhBzAHDcPYGWWsyMW+TjKRx13DRcdG0nG2v7S6l6QfRVqwZjFv0 YfrYUYw+TdsXGr4nxF65nulODEWbi6xkLuqnRQtm+YUeBfINF2dDh6wIf88VI4fDXJsh cK4ig5SDrKpaC2OXn8+OaAK5nMk6z3QLLqMOvo/CYIlhRA4d0a+abc5SBF3rIUEG9/7l s2+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=Ofq6CcxVIY8nAtWLfvIsK6jE1XZ7340ikGj28ui1BAQ=; b=eE3wN9lL6Qax97w5zdj0qxEBfsAuuQyffCdv/MDZ8xSrQ4lw3OEFvgKkMDKF0Pnhkp ziJR8Eiegnxu/x3xrpMlF7APx1FYfOv6TeAd4Loeki14PulIZ4EwcPB4haGEvvAZ0wJ8 H5L4OmQidzh61sjx1WzZZ5QCaY3bYfU4qXLmSqcPkJTq2bk7Eo/v/YwrmCK4fLlkrbw+ RKoSUYSc6UYzNMX322ypvW84Npuh7X0JgWeqLR2G93zqzAjRE2lGvTcX5RZ1S9fxwH85 rac0SaKyuNW/dB2rXTK5vN/MKJTWvTstCXKIM73zdzPWXIHZyBOIOf1pl6emyl9nvaVi gZZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lh17si39848ejb.328.2020.12.01.06.58.28; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:58:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391743AbgLAO4J (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:56:09 -0500 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:46088 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389342AbgLAO4I (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:56:08 -0500 Received: from sslproxy03.your-server.de ([88.198.220.132]) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1kk73p-0008BG-4X; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 15:55:21 +0100 Received: from [85.7.101.30] (helo=pc-9.home) by sslproxy03.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kk73o-000UG1-U8; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 15:55:20 +0100 Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree To: Stephen Rothwell , Alexei Starovoitov , Networking Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List References: <20201201190746.7d3357fb@canb.auug.org.au> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: <63c8eaad-c977-fbaf-2b5c-b035851140ea@iogearbox.net> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 15:55:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201201190746.7d3357fb@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.102.4/26005/Tue Dec 1 15:16:58 2020) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/1/20 9:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allnoconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from fs/select.c:32: > include/net/busy_poll.h: In function 'sk_mark_napi_id_once': > include/net/busy_poll.h:150:36: error: 'const struct sk_buff' has no member named 'napi_id' > 150 | __sk_mark_napi_id_once_xdp(sk, skb->napi_id); > | ^~ > > Caused by commit > > b02e5a0ebb17 ("xsk: Propagate napi_id to XDP socket Rx path") > Fixed it up in bpf-next, thanks for reporting!