Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751296AbWH2JCy (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:02:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751317AbWH2JCy (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:02:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:38888 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751297AbWH2JCw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:02:52 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060827212136.GA12710@tuatara.stupidest.org> References: <20060827212136.GA12710@tuatara.stupidest.org> <20060825193658.11384.8349.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060825193709.11384.79794.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Chris Wedgwood Cc: David Howells , axboe@kernel.dk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] [PATCH] BLOCK: Don't call block_sync_page() from AFS [try #4] X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:00:31 +0100 Message-ID: <9824.1156842031@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 685 Lines: 20 Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > The AFS filesystem specifies block_sync_page() as its sync_page > > address op, which needs to be checked, and so is commented out for > > the moment. > > Wouldn't it be better to just let the link/build fail so someone who > groks AFS internals can look into this? That would be me... I don't want the block patches getting rejected because make allyesconfig fails due to AFS not linking. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/