Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp409681pxu; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:33:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwl9iXVH1B6rOlnNAWGjO27OhYlSaLKfqRtliGltNcz3TrdwYcvgGN0KUB4tR+YD1wvVXJZ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c892:: with SMTP id p18mr5445335eds.64.1606862026411; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:33:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606862026; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LSiIxOjzVMi3Do8H8FGxuZbqJZcGzcZ7Z4CK/cayumCpvWneC5Lh/lljvsFO+PSUFX Wq++hUX9mi2PU7NVYud8DqGz7QQvpT/Gfsrm5qm0Dd2sk9iqpK8l8DVaWf6t4AFaluLz 2x31+LqodcPmAcoUzfsMMhYvd6PE6XQr985Yg1nlERngIRCs2DEv+xXSbJNLmC5g4zJ1 lzOhzpcNeWHT+BEGbtyg94nQmaTExXnWibFZEdBffVJaxCBMuq31aepSDm6ED4bUcSq3 WHHDvFWq8jYGMCXXN/AzyIz6lQ/abjSXEB9RjOVc4j/pwlDUp8mLWTQsmiXM5LIW2vaQ fDEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=KvtmDEwmNgXyl8V5E5JIJ4R6TuDcRbj9sC1C7yCz3ZE=; b=Y2LIBuk01JiOBnWwiFde4qwKCAsed/eELT6kl8Hg3O3Cwvavq/iyDrKDwzDXedGxKz lDF4mLA/wBz+AKPYb749Pv93i0zni0DIWgEUT9llX+7g5ylHqDjLRNIXO3mIJD02IIf0 Y7kMVtxLC+PFSEpsgSCVVahRmLVhOf7UJO1proigBjz6vnpdTzQ90cV4dQ19MUU8qw+w RXhcRyZnqim+MFHfREW/7e9uQfDBAPr7p+3AJqoMjZmcAGLlZbCV6O41ovvio11g6W4n 27jSOn60i9OGHzd59hAPVnel09tOUituEwY61bsZ798As6QMTY58r49QYLwmDHDsqjhA Ejtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f21si931129edc.589.2020.12.01.14.33.24; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 14:33:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726071AbgLAKrP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 05:47:15 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:40528 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725899AbgLAKrP (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 05:47:15 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38384101E; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 02:46:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.2] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB68E3F66B; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 02:46:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] scheduler: expose the topology of clusters and add cluster scheduler To: Barry Song , valentin.schneider@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxarm@huawei.com, xuwei5@huawei.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com References: <20201201025944.18260-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:46:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201201025944.18260-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/12/2020 03:59, Barry Song wrote: [...] > Although I believe there is still a lot to do, sending a RFC to get feedbacks > of community experts might be helpful for the next step. > > Barry Song (1): > scheduler: add scheduler level for clusters > > Jonathan Cameron (1): > topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die. Just to make sure. Since this is v2, the v1 is https://lkml.kernel.org/r//20201016152702.1513592-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com Might not be obvious to everyone since sender and subject have changed.