Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:59:37 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] clear_warn_once: add timed interval resetting
Message-ID: <X8Y+OVaXzAO4AWE2@alley>
References: <20201126063029.2030-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
 <X8ElwBh9tw+OLHF+@alley>
 <20201127174316.GA11748@windriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201127174316.GA11748@windriver.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri 2020-11-27 12:43:16, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > On Thu 2020-11-26 01:30:26, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > + Move clear_warn_once from debugfs to a location that is always
> >   available. For example, into /proc
> 
> I don't have a problem with that, other than won't we have to maintain
> both interfaces forever?

Yes, we would. But this patchset adds a new interface as well.
In addition, it adds also new functionality that might create new
scenarios.

Again, I am not strongly against it. But I have to think more
about it.

Best Regards,
Petr

PS: I did not comment other parts of this mail. They were either
discussed elsewhere in this thread. Or I did not have
anything to add.