Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751427AbWH2N5s (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:57:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751426AbWH2N5s (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:57:48 -0400 Received: from mail1.webmaster.com ([216.152.64.168]:60170 "EHLO mail1.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751427AbWH2N5r (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:57:47 -0400 From: "David Schwartz" To: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Subject: RE: Possible gpl problem? Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:57:40 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1156763478.5340.70.camel@pmac.infradead.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Importance: Normal X-Authenticated-Sender: joelkatz@webmaster.com X-Spam-Processed: mail1.webmaster.com, Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:52:35 -0700 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 206.171.168.138 X-Return-Path: davids@webmaster.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: davids@webmaster.com X-MDAV-Processed: mail1.webmaster.com, Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:52:37 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1726 Lines: 39 > 2. If you ever distribute binaries _without_ source code, then you're > obliged to make the source code available to _any_ third party on > request; _not_ only those to whom you gave the binaries. That's not what the GPL says. The only clauses I think you could be talking about are: b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. Note that providing a license does not require providing media. A license is a right to use, not an ability to use or a copy of the covered work. And: b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, Which, you'll notice, says you must *accompany* the distribution with a written offer. There is no way this offer could be enforced by someone who did not possess it or a copy of it. How would you know who to contact, the amount to pay, and so on? So if you neither possess the binary nor a copy of an offer for the source, you are not entitled to it. At least, that's how I read this. DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/