Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp489841pxu; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:03:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybvophvcWsMg3x4cClImpZSI67LuAX0T8cHvnJXhEA3oKe48N+3x3CYQWliNpwUFtOgZXp X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1c8a:: with SMTP id cy10mr283181edb.151.1606871022950; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:03:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606871022; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mxU2RZPjgjXk7nSkZp25KwYjWgnehYD5GCWJ+INxXblMSo+yf1JsFH31iFd0jZtedf 36P1J8cunOnd0pXrYIV53qxD53fNwaIwFIV5zus6IL/8cZKOmyiW8LSLrWlzfQHlAVEf XIj6sjtxHZGWMW8wqktHiF8GYANJQ7Dzku6J5hHkFlBg/QkEUcu1vZ8dKrQTgZpewNrc xydeVNEOAJmTQpLQCIMjJ96B5QFib/iDot3vDGpdzZrqFzxunWF9+0puh/bZ9862zISs /iGzvCWIj4DMsZjihAXolj7fYeF/nnRqQjIF2qfWbh29acTynIsjZ+YkVq3G43iexlqM W2gg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Odv4zRt1KHT39evbyQRVAXDLOsIsZ8X++QuLSoooG/Y=; b=jbo77J2o+htCs+0SWVy6K0/Qn9yNymy6uEzcUYauoX2t+gOIFs1D6Jp6d0fUgl/gg/ 4w3WX99cBSjlyxSIg8Sfz40tUro0I+2NAD7gP+R60xhESZT8SebGh3tz8TF2l8EFi9ns KeDyczScs8WN4gTfl7lEI3wlkoJ25fznQ38qe5DJREt2tCx/Q6kHHKlUiBh82ivxsAxy 7BNURa9rLyhXpVT/QQ3VwAn+2iG2CNO8ut7PF4Zuw7NnFo5B+LbRQJOSkoQ7SLvvk2/S fNuYA6tl2lU+YYAREop6jC/9bVguvGdOHDr3YeaxRIh46gUk+PH9jdRHvN+OunRrHRx0 Q0Vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=uUEL4mPs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j23si941955ejb.158.2020.12.01.17.03.19; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:03:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=uUEL4mPs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727075AbgLBBCC (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:02:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59524 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726619AbgLBBCC (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:02:02 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb43.google.com (mail-yb1-xb43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4F0C0613CF; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:01:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb43.google.com with SMTP id o71so100569ybc.2; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:01:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Odv4zRt1KHT39evbyQRVAXDLOsIsZ8X++QuLSoooG/Y=; b=uUEL4mPshv29R4UIPc6B9LFcY39jrOba/FrFIgIrq6nOI0GWjXGxRROwNpCzw2az7F IvPSHar90O1yiOO2hd3DYIepYygVjcI4E5PSgvDOX+obQ31tmEK3zgiRi2Zmo8+IP1SJ YsWeyOIqgIeQthJ1edKTbrvstEFoDpDlqmg0feXd4/qRchksnvGDr/H1lh9j7USetAaq 2PEBOQLRVVVsLrNzohbw5vyxt6TBQFHaDq6x88sIz5VKTXmptq9Qd0aB9ZsI6rDkRqIp GOaCkOGA5U5oesghz5Ai8EJJ2kjUTu7ZqFXfzw+8aqRKzpYNL1p6foj8JTP85+zoBsbG eenA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Odv4zRt1KHT39evbyQRVAXDLOsIsZ8X++QuLSoooG/Y=; b=D8FHH+h6SdQHAeLFy0ys/fCNe4k49Lw4Dr1AXPaPD59XmsdlEzwa+619pheKTR5QJ+ BMNemcpzT2h9N75KwpWrZERTjcvU4dHdMaGgNObl6Eyk8HCN15NclNTFhqbO6WRvFLHm ZxkCot+H/v1v988ma0XHiR+40reicwMZ5NV2GUH47bPpTU9kLkTi3DfggkDHU7TPjTl0 /AuPe+z9UXTyhvKivy2yqBOjC/ePrJZSH8Xc20SZhzhpu16z3fxswlQt8U2LSdtg+K/e 7knuWrXZzXWELlxV4l+dFH2UhgOIwj5oTygOEtJZnGj9McwHSR4yMSl+9x+vTMExGB7k 3c2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MZsPQ5EYIu0gpgNQ98sLwPe9gbJmyG18rCls4sjlfdZjVtyHX d4i/xOrm5y9Y09ASYimm7wcYcIx4YF0JHc42FR8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:585:: with SMTP id 127mr88820ybf.425.1606870881067; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 17:01:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201126170212.1749137-1-revest@google.com> <20201126170212.1749137-2-revest@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20201126170212.1749137-2-revest@google.com> From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:01:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add a selftest for the tracing bpf_get_socket_cookie To: Florent Revest Cc: bpf , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , KP Singh , Florent Revest , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 9:02 AM Florent Revest wrote: > > This builds up on the existing socket cookie test which checks whether > the bpf_get_socket_cookie helpers provide the same value in > cgroup/connect6 and sockops programs for a socket created by the > userspace part of the test. > > Adding a tracing program to the existing objects requires a different > attachment strategy and different headers. > > Signed-off-by: Florent Revest > --- > .../selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++--- > .../selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c | 18 +++++--- > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c > index 0cb5656a22b0..a11026aeaaf1 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/socket_cookie_prog.c > @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@ > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > // Copyright (c) 2018 Facebook > > -#include > -#include > +#include "vmlinux.h" > > #include > #include > +#include > + > +#define AF_INET6 10 > > struct socket_cookie { > __u64 cookie_key; > @@ -19,6 +21,14 @@ struct { > __type(value, struct socket_cookie); > } socket_cookies SEC(".maps"); > > +/* > + * These three programs get executed in a row on connect() syscalls. The > + * userspace side of the test creates a client socket, issues a connect() on it > + * and then checks that the local storage associated with this socket has: > + * cookie_value == local_port << 8 | 0xFF > + * The different parts of this cookie_value are appended by those hooks if they > + * all agree on the output of bpf_get_socket_cookie(). > + */ > SEC("cgroup/connect6") > int set_cookie(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) > { > @@ -32,14 +42,14 @@ int set_cookie(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx) > if (!p) > return 1; > > - p->cookie_value = 0xFF; > + p->cookie_value = 0xF; > p->cookie_key = bpf_get_socket_cookie(ctx); > > return 1; > } > > SEC("sockops") > -int update_cookie(struct bpf_sock_ops *ctx) > +int update_cookie_sockops(struct bpf_sock_ops *ctx) > { > struct bpf_sock *sk; > struct socket_cookie *p; > @@ -60,11 +70,32 @@ int update_cookie(struct bpf_sock_ops *ctx) > if (p->cookie_key != bpf_get_socket_cookie(ctx)) > return 1; > > - p->cookie_value = (ctx->local_port << 8) | p->cookie_value; > + p->cookie_value |= (ctx->local_port << 8); > > return 1; > } > > +SEC("fexit/inet_stream_connect") > +int BPF_PROG(update_cookie_tracing, struct socket *sock, > + struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len, int flags) > +{ > + struct socket_cookie *p; > + > + if (uaddr->sa_family != AF_INET6) > + return 0; > + > + p = bpf_sk_storage_get(&socket_cookies, sock->sk, 0, 0); > + if (!p) > + return 0; > + > + if (p->cookie_key != bpf_get_socket_cookie(sock->sk)) > + return 0; > + > + p->cookie_value |= 0xF0; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > int _version SEC("version") = 1; please remove this, while you are at it > > char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c > index ca7ca87e91aa..0d955c65a4f8 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_socket_cookie.c > @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ static int run_test(int cgfd) > struct bpf_prog_load_attr attr; > struct bpf_program *prog; > struct bpf_object *pobj; > + struct bpf_link *link; > const char *prog_name; > int server_fd = -1; > int client_fd = -1; > @@ -153,11 +154,18 @@ static int run_test(int cgfd) > bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, pobj) { > prog_name = bpf_program__section_name(prog); > > - if (libbpf_attach_type_by_name(prog_name, &attach_type)) > - goto err; > - > - err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), cgfd, attach_type, > - BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE); > + if (bpf_program__is_tracing(prog)) { > + link = bpf_program__attach(prog); > + err = !link; link is a pointer, so use libbpf_get_error() > + continue; > + } else { else branch is not really necessary, just adds indentation unnecessarily > + if (libbpf_attach_type_by_name(prog_name, &attach_type)) > + goto err; > + > + err = bpf_prog_attach(bpf_program__fd(prog), cgfd, > + attach_type, > + BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE); > + } > if (err) { > log_err("Failed to attach prog %s", prog_name); > goto out; > -- > 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog >