Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1021550pxu; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:06:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlim7DJauZgSe5ZpZlCE/LSgy4cFdVbL5i+sVJ2PTssii/RenlrunHuVOM1ga4V00niEC7 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2059:: with SMTP id bc25mr875568edb.13.1606928795257; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 09:06:35 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1606928795; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vHMQfJoJBKy6WwF4x6lFkrqlQlCwOys2f43AZa2WfudpSQxsPcoQh1CauKX+JPjjH7 eP2SZonJJEUyda8NY74b0e9KQuMzsYS9YtiSdoMJWRfwigwtbYwnQ7Ko2aJycXRknHP2 TsQjsQ95Ic1zsnIDjjFi+ymd8VQHulUgbUKIy/sSxjLG6aNqbMBohYPAvK/NJfLwJIJC QO1IUxM0WAyyp+9IJ7ZgY1QSC3hN1koYSfqOd1cn1fvMN/MPGFpGl0P0bUHTUh1KmWQX BT73k22bKJZAqLepzpNA98rHQiXKMwcjHAXO1P2ESciB+tEbnBVLGxmN917/qcIe17gX xl9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :dkim-signature; bh=VkAK9awdrlq9A2BqEcSqkXYPO2nZPqg2uDrl8aCSr8c=; b=pkDEGJvgrkU/n0fFpI6FWJijFkB5onNQ47a5CLHQqXML5r37z7hRUevtJ8/6bYYtzk Zm1FQjMJjgy32GZBeIhPE2g2e9qvNpeUJv9H4F9SlRBNY9B15PL5/m9AkvDhapyMXBag DgInXF90MUf5wzQ4gkTjRvm44ryrD6pwKKX7kpgScjp3wqHIZw8Sh5y46rYd3O3UV1i0 AYjf9WPNGGqsMMl40cPP8bqKFqTija6ELBSCTkmEnb+XBnHbQNEWeQ5P4TKw+KiKX4hQ q8qLtykymDbpHyCVdO8qWBwzrWaDY10LvfXD69em+wpyO1t+3poLS4mAmL4/g6+edWzU zY6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=FpXLeMbG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j30si336253edd.363.2020.12.02.09.06.10; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 09:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=FpXLeMbG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387577AbgLBREc (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:04:32 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:13434 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387464AbgLBREc (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:04:32 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B2GVeXk018304; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:03:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=VkAK9awdrlq9A2BqEcSqkXYPO2nZPqg2uDrl8aCSr8c=; b=FpXLeMbGp2LkCIUGhyE6f6Rd77dMZhgDDxn23HsKYaTE0uEEb+HTLSNWLglI964V1Bo7 Ir9vbn6RkxaIsmvPnU9yYR9N7/B4gLE9NqfAxwmBdVBy2CiqO5M3RGErR27UochMCyMp itAioCGaob3hYYkFD0P6ETc5Sr+B7raPrz/haj0V258fk75u2Ndj4j9hbH94wosQ4Bw5 v6C8u5QgukhHIsb/zEr2YLopx7suwT9TZaSbs+qbE6io0FjgN2sVr2kLqAuvI7iXI/91 lamQi1YtH+BS2fnqciYt7rLfRhTBE9qcKNgsaqPhOkuNI0IpMa9pg4VEONxTsozJVUXH mQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3569tgk0hc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:03:41 -0500 Received: from m0098414.ppops.net (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 0B2GiTnx056004; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:03:41 -0500 Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3569tgk0gm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:03:41 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B2H26QK013988; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:03:39 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 354fpdb622-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:03:39 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0B2H3a6Y58065406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:03:37 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2115204E; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:03:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-f45666cc-3089-11b2-a85c-c57d1a57929f.ibm.com (unknown [9.160.92.233]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5092452052; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:03:35 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] evm: Execute evm_inode_init_security() only when an HMAC key is loaded From: Mimi Zohar To: Roberto Sassu , mjg59@google.com Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:03:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-2-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <20201111092302.1589-2-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-12.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312,18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-02_08:2020-11-30,2020-12-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012020096 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 10:22 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > evm_inode_init_security() requires an HMAC key to calculate the HMAC on > initial xattrs provided by LSMs. However, it checks generically whether a > key has been loaded, including also public keys, which is not correct as > public keys are not suitable to calculate the HMAC. > > Originally, support for signature verification was introduced to verify a > possibly immutable initial ram disk, when no new files are created, and to > switch to HMAC for the root filesystem. By that time, an HMAC key should > have been loaded and usable to calculate HMACs for new files. > > More recently support for requiring an HMAC key was removed from the > kernel, so that signature verification can be used alone. Since this is a > legitimate use case, evm_inode_init_security() should not return an error > when no HMAC key has been loaded. > > This patch fixes this problem by replacing the evm_key_loaded() check with > a check of the EVM_INIT_HMAC flag in evm_initialized. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.5.x > Fixes: 26ddabfe96b ("evm: enable EVM when X509 certificate is loaded") > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu > Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar > --- > security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c > index 76d19146d74b..001e001eae01 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c > +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c > @@ -530,7 +530,8 @@ int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, > struct evm_xattr *xattr_data; > int rc; > > - if (!evm_key_loaded() || !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name)) > + if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) || > + !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name)) > return 0; > > xattr_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*xattr_data), GFP_NOFS); Let's update the function description to make it explicit. Something like: "evm_inode_init_security - initializes security.evm HMAC value" Mimi