Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <2dafb87ff450776c0406311bb7e235e9816f6ecf.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: ufs: Keep device power on only
 fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate == 1
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
        "alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        "asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
        "jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        "stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        "beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        "bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        "tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
        "cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 03 Dec 2020 10:40:30 +0100
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR04MB6575B7ECCEA7335B2CFC2AC4FCF20@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20201130181143.5739-1-huobean@gmail.com>
         <20201130181143.5739-3-huobean@gmail.com>
         <BY5PR04MB6599826730BD3FB0E547E60587F30@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
         <DM6PR04MB6575B7ECCEA7335B2CFC2AC4FCF20@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 07:27 +0000, Avri Altman wrote:
> > 
> > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> > 
> > Keep device power mode as active power mode and VCC supply only if
> > fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate setting 1 is successful.

Hi Avri
Thanks so much taking time reiew.

> Why would it fail?

During the reliability testing in harsh environments, such as:
EMS testing, in the high/low-temperature environment. The system would
reboot itself, there will be programming failure very likely.
If we assume failure will never hit, why we capture its result
following with dev_err(). If you keep using your phone in a harsh
environment, you will see this print message.

Of course, in a normal environment, the chance of failure likes you to
win a lottery, but the possibility still exists.

  
> Since UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN is toggled off on ufshcd_wb_probe If the
> device doesn't support wb,
> The check ufshcd_is_wb_allowed should suffice, isn't it?
> 

No, UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN only tells us if the platform supports WB,
doesn't tell us fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate status.

Thanks,
Bean